Using the Tuning Methodology to design the founding benchmark competences for a new academic professional field: the case of Advanced Rehabilitation Technologies
Designing innovative high quality educational programmes to meet the workforce needs in emerging interdisciplinary areas of practice can present challenges to academics, students, employers and industrial partners. This paper demonstrates how the Tuning Process successfully helped to construct benchmark learning outcomes and competences in the area of healthcare practice where advanced technologies are used to improve movement namely Rehabilitation Technologies (RTs). The paper also discusses the engagement of patients, carers and carer organisations within the development of competences. Due to changing demographics, limited resources and the availability of technology, rehabilitation technologies are starting to be used for the assessment and treatment of patients. However there are currently no European transnational Bachelor or Master programmes targeted at educating people for the design, development, use and evaluation of these technologies. The contemporary field is predominantly staffed and resourced by engineering scientists and clinicians who were primarily educated in their primary discipline. The first generations of rehabilitation technologists have established this specialist field through invention, perseverance, and collaborative working. However, there is now a recognition that new and complementary skill sets are required by future graduates, whether engineering scientists or clinicians, so as to better meet the needs of clients and the employment market whether in the domains of industry, research, academia or clinical practice. This project demonstrates how a group of European specialist rehabilitation technologists, supported by educationalists, collaborated to identify and develop the core competences and learning outcomes required by future Master’s (second cycle) graduates in this new discipline. Building on the work of the Tuning Process and applying the principles embedded in the Bologna Process, future employability needs are determined through an imaginative, technological and cost conscious entrepreneurial approach to education.
Published online: 06 June 2016
America, Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North. “Resources and Definitions.”http://www.resna.org/resources-definitions.
Burridge, Jane, and Ann-Marie Hughes. “Potential for New Technologies in Clinical Practice.” Current Opinion in Neurology 23, no. 6 (Dec 2010): 671-7.
European Commission. “Commission Staff Working Document on an Action Plan for the EU Health Workforce Report No. Contract No. Swd 93 Final.” Strasbourg, 2012.
_____. “White (Coat) Jobs: The Eu Health Workforce.” In Jobs for Europe: The Employment Policy Conference, edited by European Commission, 1-4. Brussels: European Commnission, 2012.
Cumberland Consensus Working Group, B. Cheeran, L. Cohen, B. Dobkin, G. Ford, R. Greenwood, D. Howard et al. “The Future of Restorative Neurosciences in Stroke: Driving the Translational Research Pipeline from Basic Science to Rehabilitation of People after Stroke.” Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23, no. 2 (Feb 2009): 97-107.
Eurostat. “Nace Rev.2 Categories 86 & 87.” 2011.
Frenk, Julio, Lincoln Chen, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, Jordan Cohen, Nigel Crisp, Timothy Evans, Harvey Fineberg et al. “Health Professionals for a New Century: Transforming Education to Strengthen Health Systems in an Interdependent World.” The Lancet 376, no. 9756 (2010): 1923-58.
Lokhoff, Jenneke, Bas Wegewijs, Katja Durkin, Robert Wagenaar, Julia González, Ann Katherine Isaacs, Luigi F. Donà dalle Rose, and Mary Gobbi, eds. A Tuning Guide to Formulating Degree Programme Profiles. Including Programme Competences and Programme Learning Outcomes. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto, 2010.
Macleod-Clark, Jill and Humphris Debra. “Shaping a Vision for a ‘New Generation’ Workforce.” 14. University of Southampton: Institute for Public Policy Research Project Paper, 2002.
Nichols Melanie, Nick Townsend, Ramon Luengo-Fernandez, Jose Leal, Alastair Gray, Peter Scarborough, and Mike Rayner. “European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2012.” 2012.
Nissani, Moti. “Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinarity: The Case for Interdisciplinary Knowledge and Research.” The Social Science Journal 34, no. 2 (1997): 201-16.
O’Halloran, Cath., Sarah Hean, Debra Humphris, and Jill. Macleod-Clark. “Developing Common Learning: The New Generation Project Undergraduate Curriculum Model.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 20, no. 1 (2006/01/01 2006): 12-28.
Universities’ Contribution to the Bologna Process. An Introduction. Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Edited by J; Wagenaar Gonzalez, R. 2nd ed. Bilbao, Spain: University of Deusto Press, 2008.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.