Factors influencing postgraduate students’ intention to use learning management system
Learning management systems (LMS) are continuously being implemented in tertiary institutions to manage and strengthen educational activities. LMS such as Moodle facilitates the management of learning content, collaboration, and communication. However, there have been limited studies examining factors influencing postgraduate students’ intention to use LMS in Malaysian universities, as studies mainly concentrate on undergraduates’ use intentions. Therefore, this study investigates factors influencing the behavioural intention to use LMS based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The results indicated performance expectancy (PE) followed by social influence (SI) and effort expectancy (EE) as the factors influencing the behavioural intention (BI) to use LMS. Concurrently, facilitating conditions (FC) were found not to influence BI, and we denote that socio-economy standings and maturity influence their overall acceptance of the LMS. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed accordingly.
Received: 13 August 2021
Accepted: 11 April 2022
Abbott, Martin L. Understanding Educational Statistics Using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. New Jersey: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc, 2011.
Abdel-Maksoud, Nahed F. “The Relationship between Students’ Satisfaction in the LMS ‘Acadox’ and Their Perceptions of Its Usefulness, and Ease of Use.” Journal of Education and Learning 7, no. 2 (2018): 184. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n2p184.
Ain, Noor Ul, Kiran Kaur, and Mehwish Waheed. “The Influence of Learning Value on Learning Management System Use: An Extension of UTAUT2.” Information Development 32, no. 5(2016): 1306–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915597546.
Ajibade, Patrick. “Technology Acceptance Model Limitations and Criticisms: Exploring the Practical Applications and Use in Technology-Related Studies, Mixed-Method, and Qualitative Researches.” Library Philosophy and Practice 00, no. 00 (2018): 1–13.
Al-Hunaiyyan, Ahmed, Salah Al-Sharhan, and Rana AlHajri. “Prospects and Challenges of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education.” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 11, no. 12 (2020): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0111209.
Al-Zaidiyeen, Naser Jamil, and Leong Lai Mei. “Teachers’ Attitudes and Levels of Technology Use in Classrooms: The Case of Jordan Schools.” International Education Studies 3, no. 2 (2010): 211–18.
Alhassan, A., A. Rashad, and K.A. Gbolagade. “An Enhanced Web-Based Platform for Mobile Learning Management System.” International Journal of Computer Applications 124, no. 16 (2015): 30–34. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2015905807.
Alias, Nor, and Ahmad Zainuddin. “Innovation for Better Teaching and Learning: Adopting the Learning Management System.” Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology 2, no. 2 (2005): 27–40.
Annamalai, Nagaletchimee, and Jeya Amantha Kumar. “Understanding Smartphone Use Behavior among Distance Education Students in Completing Their Coursework in English: A Mixed-Method Approach.” Reference Librarian 61, no. 3–4 (2020): 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2020.1815630.
Annamalai, Nagaletchimee, T. Ramayah, Jeya Amantha Kumar, and Sharifah Osman. “Investigating the Use of Learning Management System (Lms) for Distance Education in Malaysia: A Mixed-Method Approach.” Contemporary Educational Technology 13, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10987.
Bakar, Azlina Abu, Fahmi Zaidi Abdul Razak, and Wan Salihin Wong Abdullah. “Assessing the Effects of UTAUT and Self-Determination Predictor on Students Continuance Intention to Use Student Portal.” World Applied Sciences Journal 21, no. 10 (2013): 1484–89. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.10.2920.
Bervell, Brandford, Jeya Amantha Kumar, Valentina Arkorful, Emmanuel Manu Agyapong, and Sharifah Osman. “Remodelling the Role of Facilitating Conditions for Google Classroom Acceptance: A Revision of UTAUT2.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 38, no. 1 (2021): 115–35. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7178.
Binyamin, Sami, Malcolm Rutter, and Sally Smith. “The Students’ Acceptance of Learning Management Systems in Saudi Arabia: A Case Study of King Abdulaziz University.” INTED2017 Proceedings 1, no. 3 (2017): 9324–33. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.2205.
Blut, Markus, Loong Chong, Zayyad Tsiga, and Viswanath Venkatesh. “Meta- Analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Challenging Its Validity and Charting a Research Agenda in the Red Ocean.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 2, no. 5 (2021): 1–128.
Castro, Robin. “Blended Learning in Higher Education: Trends and Capabilities.” Education and Information Technologies 24, no. 4 (2019): 2523–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3.
Chao, Cheng-Min. “Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model.” Frontiers in Psychology 10, no. July 2019 (2019): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652.
Chauhan, Sumedha, and Mahadeo Jaiswal. “Determinants of Acceptance of ERP Software Training in Business Schools: Empirical Investigation Using UTAUT Model.” International Journal of Management Education 14, no. 3 (2016): 248–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.05.005.
Dwivedi, Yogesh K, Nripendra P Rana, Hsin Chen, and Michael D Williams. “A Meta-Analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology ( UTAUT ).” Governance and Sustainability in Information Systems. Managing the Transfer and Diffusion of IT, 2011, 155–70.
Efiloğlu Kurt, Özlem, and Özhan Tingöy. “The Acceptance and Use of a Virtual Learning Environment in Higher Education: An Empirical Study in Turkey, and the UK.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14, no. 26 (2017): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0064-z.
Eraslan Yalcin, Muyesser, and Birgul Kutlu. “Examination of Students’ Acceptance of and Intention to Use Learning Management Systems Using Extended TAM.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50, no. 5 (2019): 2414–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12798.
Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, WA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
Ghavifekr, Simin, and Hazline Mahmood. “Factors Affecting Use of E-Learning Platform (SPeCTRUM) among University Students in Malaysia.” Education and Information Technologies 22, no. 1 (2017): 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9435-z.
Hair, Joseph F., Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance.” Long Range Planning 46, no. 1–2 (2013): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001.
Hair, Joseph F., Jeffrey J. Risher, Marko Sarstedt, and Christian M. Ringle. “When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM.” European Business Review 31, no. 1 (2019): 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
Haron, Hafiza, Supyan Hussin, Ahmad Rizal Mohd Yusof, Hafiza Samad, and Hafidzan Yusof. “MOOC : A Technology Adoption Using UTAUT Model at Public Universities.” Test Engineering and Management 83, no. 3146 (2020): 3146–51.
Hsu, Hsiao-hui. “The Acceptance of Moodle: An Empirical Study Based on UTAUT.” Creative Education 3, no. 8 (2012): 44–46. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38b010.
Ifinedo, Princely. “Acceptance and Continuance Intention of Web-Based Learning Technologies (WLT) Use among University Students in a Baltic Country.” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 23, no. 1 (2006): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00151.x.
Juhary, Jowati. “Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use of the Learning Management System as a Learning Tool.” International Education Studies 7, no. 8 (2014): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n8p23.
Khechine, Hager, Sawsen Lakhal, Daniel Pascot, and Alphonse Bytha. “UTAUT Model for Blended Learning: The Role of Gender and Age in the Intention to Use Webinars.” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning 10 (2014): 033–052. https://doi.org/10.28945/1994.
Kite, James, Timothy E. Schlub, Ying Zhang, Silvia Choi, Sarah Craske, and Michelle Dickson. “Exploring Lecturer and Student Perceptions and Use of a Learning Management System in a Postgraduate Public Health Environment.” E-Learning and Digital Media 17, no. 3 (2020): 183–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020909217.
Korhonen, A. M., S. Ruhalahti, and M. Veermans. “The Online Learning Process and Scaffolding in Student Teachers’ Personal Learning Environments.” Education and Information Technologies 24, no. 1 (2019): 755–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9793-4.
Kumar, Jeya. Amantha., Brandford Bervell, Nagaletchimee Annamalai, and Sharifah Osman. “Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning : Evaluating the Role of Self-Efficacy, Subjective Norm, and WhatsApp Use Habit.” IEEE Access 8 (2020): 208058–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3037925.
Kumar, Jeya. Amantha., Segar Rajamanickam, and Sharifah Osman. “Exploring the Use of Mobile Apps for Learning : A Case Study on Final Year Engineering Undergraduates in Malaysia.” ASM Science Journal 13, no. Special Issue 3 (2020): 63–67.
Kumar, Jeya. Amantha., Paula Alexandra Silva, and Renugha Prelath. “Implementing Studio-Based Learning for Design Education: A Study on the Perception and Challenges of Malaysian Undergraduates.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 31, no. 3 (2021): 611–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09566-1.
Kumar, Jeya Amantha, and Brandford Bervell. “Google Classroom for Mobile Learning in Higher Education : Modelling the Initial Perceptions of Students.” Education and Information Technologies 24 (2019): 1793–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-09858-z.
Kumar, Jeya Amantha, Brandford Bervell, and Sharifah Osman. “Google Classroom: Insights from Malaysian Higher Education Students’ and Instructors’ Experiences.” Education and Information Technologies, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10163-x.
Lwoga, Edda Tandi, and Mercy Komba. “Antecedents of Continued Usage Intentions of Web-Based Learning Management System in Tanzania.” Education and Training 57, no. 7 (2015): 738–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2014-0014.
Maruping, Likoebe M., Hillol Bala, Viswanath Venkatesh, and Susan A. Brown. “Going beyond Intention: Integrating Behavioral Expectation into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68, no. 3 (2017): 623–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23699.
McKeown, Tui, and Mary Anderson. “UTAUT: Capturing Differences in Undergraduate versus Postgraduate Learning?” Education and Training 58, no. 9 (2016): 945–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2015-0058.
Moreno, Valter, Flavia Cavazotte, and Isabela Alves. “Explaining University Students’ Effective Use of e-Learning Platforms.” British Journal of Educational Technology 48, no. 4 (2017): 995–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12469.
Mpungose, Cedric Bheki, and Simon Bheki Khoza. “Postgraduate Students’ Experiences on the Use of Moodle and Canvas Learning Management System.” Technology, Knowledge and Learning, September 29, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09475-1.
Muijs, Daniel. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2004.
Muruthy, Aggilanda Easwary, and Fadhilah Mat Yamin. “The Perception and Effectiveness of Learning Management System (LMS) Usage among the Higher Education Students.” Journal of Technology and Operations Managemen 12, no. 1 (2017): 86–98.
Nurakun, Zhumagul, Rita Ismailova, and Hakan Dündar. “Learning Management System Implementation: A Case Study in the Kyrgyz Republic.” Interactive Learning Environments 26, no. 8 (2018): 1010–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1427115.
Pardamean, Bens, and Mario Susanto. “Assessing User Acceptance toward Blog Technology Using the UTAUT Model.” International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 6, no. 1 (2012): 203–12.
Paulsen, M. F. “Online Education Systems : Discussion and Definition of Terms.” NKI Distance Education 4, no. 2 (2002): 1–8.
Raman, Arumugam, Yahya Don, Rozalina Khalid, and Mohd Rizuan. “Usage of Learning Management System (Moodle) among Postgraduate Students: UTAUT Model.” Asian Social Science 10, no. 14 (2014): 186–92. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n14p186.
Raman, Arumugam, and Mohan Rathakrishnan. “Blended Learning via Google Classroom: English Language Students Experience Based on UTAUT Model and Flow Theory.” Hamdard Islamicus, XLIII (1) (2020).
Raman, Arumugam, Raamani Thannimalai, Mohan Rathakrishnan, and Siti Noor Ismail. “Investigating the Influence of Intrinsic Motivation on Behavioral Intention and Actual Use of Technology in Moodle Platforms.” International Journal of Instruction 15, no. 1 (2022): 1003–24. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15157a.
Roslina, A. T., M. K. Nur Shaminah, and T. Sian-Hoon. “Students’ Satisfaction on Blended Learning: A Preliminary Study.” Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities 21, no. 3 (2013): 1119-1131.
Ross, Spencer M. “Slack It to Me: Complementing LMS With Student-Centric Communications for the Millennial/Post-Millennial Student.” Journal of Marketing Education 41, no. 2 (2019): 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475319833113.
Samaila, Kamaludeen, Khashyaullah Abdulfattah, and Ahmad Fahimi Ibn Amir. “Learning Management System Usage with Postgraduate School : An Application of UTAUT Model.” International Journal of Education and Evaluation 3, no. 12 (2017): 38–49.
Samsudeen, Sabraz Nawaz, and Rusith Mohamed. “University Students’ Intention to Use e-Learning Systems.” Interactive Technology and Smart Education 16, no. 3 (2019): 219–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2018-0092.
Šumak, Boštjan, Maja Pušnik, Marjan Heričko, and Andrej Šorgo. “Differences between Prospective, Existing, and Former Users of Interactive Whiteboards on External Factors Affecting Their Adoption, Usage and Abandonment.” Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2017): 733–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.006.
Teo, Timothy. “A Comparison of Non-Nested Models in Explaining Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology.” British Journal of Educational Technology 44, no. 3 (2013): 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01350.x.
Teo, Timothy, Mingming Zhou, Andy Chun Wai Fan, and Fang Huang. “Factors That Influence University Students’ Intention to Use Moodle: A Study in Macau.” Educational Technology Research and Development 67, no. 3 (2019): 749–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09650-x.
Tsai, Yueh Ying, Cheng Min Chao, Hong Mau Lin, and Bor Wen Cheng. “Nursing Staff Intentions to Continuously Use a Blended E-Learning System from an Integrative Perspective.” Quality and Quantity 52, no. 6 (2018): 2495–2513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0540-5.
Venkatesh, Viswanath, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 27, no. 3 (2003): 425–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
Venkatesh, Viswanath, James Y L Thong, and Xin Xu. “Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 17, no. 5 (2016): 328–76.
Wang, Wei Tsong, and Chun Chieh Wang. “An Empirical Study of Instructor Adoption of Web-Based Learning Systems.” Computers and Education 53, no. 3 (2009): 761–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.021.
Zaidi, Nurul Nazariah Binti Mohd. “Application of E-Learning for Teaching Hadith in Higher Education Institutional Education in Malaysia: A Literature Review.” Journal of Quran Sunnah Education & Special Needs 3, no. 2 (2019): 28–34.
Zainuddin, Nurkhamimi, Rozhan Idrus, and Ahmad Farid Mohd Jamal. “Moodle as an ODL Teaching Tool: A Perspective of Students and Academics.” Electronic Journal of E-Learning 14, no. 4 (2016): 282–90.
Zainuddin, Zamzami, and Corinne Jacqueline Perera. “Supporting Students’ Self- Directed Learning in the Flipped Classroom through the LMS TES BlendSpace.” On the Horizon 26, no. 4 (2018): 281–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-04-2017-0016.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.