Incremental steps towards a competency-based post-secondary education system in Ontario
Abstract
As one of Canada’s 13 distinct jurisdictions, Ontario is a national leader in developing a competency-based postsecondary education system. Hindered by challenges of a disaggregated system of policy actors in system design, quality assurance and credit transfer, sweeping change has not occurred. Instead, various bodies with operational powers over university, college, or private-provider quality assurance have slowly incorporated concepts of competency-based education into frameworks by introducing learning outcomes. This paper outlines the challenges facing Canadian and Ontario postsecondary education, discusses the roles and responsibilities of agencies involved in quality assurance, and actions made towards developing and implementing learning outcomes at the system level. The research highlights the ad-hoc and unaligned activities, but also demonstrates the commitment to move towards a competency-based education system.
Published online: 20 December 2014
Downloads
References
Association of Community Colleges and Universities. “Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP).” Accessed February 26, 2014, https://www.aacu.org/leap/.
Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. The Revitalization of Undergraduate Education in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Association of Universities and Colleges, Canada, 2011.
Canadian Bureau for International Education. “About IE: Tuning.” Accessed February 26, 2014, http://www.cbie-bcei.ca/about-ie/tuning/.
Clark, Ian, Greg Moran, Michael Skolnik, and David Trick. Academic Transformation: The Forces Reshaping Higher Education in Ontario. Kingston, ON: McGill- Queen’s University Press, 2009.
Colleges Ontario. “Key Performance Indicators.” Accessed January 26, 2014, http://www.collegesontario.org/outcomes/key-performance-indicators.html.
Council of Ministers of Education, Canada, Ministerial Statement on Quality Assurance of Degree Education in Canada. Toronto, Ontario: Council of Ministers of Education, Canada, 2007.
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. The Shift to Learning Outcomes: Conceptual, Political and Practical Developments in Europe. Luxemburg: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, 2008.
Haskel, Barbara. “Where there’s a Will …: Reforming Postsecondary Education in Canada’s and the European Union’s Decentralized Systems.” Canadian Public Administration 56, no. 2 (2013): 304-321.
Hatchette, Virginia. “The Value of Learning Outcomes: The Canadian Perspective.” In Measuring the Value of a Postsecondary Education, edited by Norrie, Ken and Mary Catharine Lennon, 87-101. Kingston-Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2012.
Heath, Nick. Student Mobility in Canada across Canadian Jurisdictions. Windsor, Ontario: Pan-Canadian Consortium on Admissions and Transfer, 2012.
_____. Student Mobility within the Province of Ontario: Supplement to the Report on the Pan-Canadian Survey of Student Mobility. Windsor, Ontario: Pan- Canadian Consortium on Admissions and Transfer, 2012.
Higher Education Strategy Associates. Changing Times, Changing Places: The Global Evolution of the Bachelor’s Degree and the Implications for Ontario. Toronto, Ontario: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, 2012.
Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Annual Report 2010/2011. Toronto, Ontario: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, 2010.
Jankowski, Natasha and David Marshall. DQP Road Map to Enhanced Student Learning: Implementing the DOP and Tuning. Urbana, IL: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) and Institute for Evidence-Based Change (IEBC), 2014.
Jones, Glen A., ed., Higher Education in Canada: Different Systems, Different Perspectives, edited by New York: Garland Pub., 1997.
Junor, Sean and Alex Usher. Student Mobility and Credit Transfer a National and Global Survey: Educational Policy Institute, 2008.
Kennedy, Declan, Aine Hyland and Nora Ryan, “Writing and using Learning Outcomes”, In Bologna Handbook, Implementing Bologna in your Institution, C3.4-1, (2006): 1-30.
Klein-Collins, Rebecca. Competency-Based Degree Programs in the U.S.: Postsecondary Credentials for Measurable Student Learning and Performance. USA: Council for Adult and Experiential Learning, 2012.
Lennon, Mary Catharine. Piloting the CLA in Ontario. Toronto, Ontario: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, 2014.
Lennon, Mary Catharine and Linda Jonker. AHELO: The Ontario Experience. Toronto, Ontario: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, 2014.
Lennon, Mary Catharine and Brian Frank, “Learning outcomes assessments in a decentralized environment: The Canadian Case.” In Higher Education Learning Outcomes Assessments: International Perspectives, edited by Hamish Coates, 89-112. Frankfurt; Peter Lang, 2014.
Lennon, Mary Catharine, Brian Frank, Rhonda Lenton, Kirsten Madsen, Abdelwahab Omri, and Roddy Turner. Tuning: Identifying and Measuring Sector-Based Learning Outcomes in Postsecondary Education. Toronto, Ontario: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, 2014.
Lumina Foundation. The Degree Quali fi cations Pro fi le. USA: Lumina Foundation, nd.
Miller, Margaret A. From Denial to Acceptance: The Stages of Assessment. USA: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, 2012.
Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities. “Essential Employability Skills.” Accessed January 26, 2014, http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/pepg/audiences/colleges/progstan/essential.html.
_____. “Ontario Qualifications Framework (OQF).” Accessed February 26, 2014, 2014, http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/pepg/programs/oqf/QsAsOQF.html.
Mitchel, Amy, Lane Trotter, Wendy Wilson, and Ryan Walmsley. Facilitating College to University Transfer in the European Higher Education Area and Beyond: Opportunities for Ontario’s College of Applied Arts and Technology. London, Ontario: ONTransfer and College University Consortium Council, 2013.
Mulder, Martin, Tanja Weigel, and Kate Collins. “The Concept of Competence in the Development of Vocational Education and Training in Selected EU Member States: A Critical Analysis.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 59, no. 1 (2007): 67-88.
Ontario College Quality Assurance Agency. Colleges Moving to an Accreditation Process. New Model Starts 2015. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario College Quality Assurance Agency, 2013.
Ontario Council on Articulation and Transfer. Credit Transfer Saves Ontario’s Postsecondary Students Time and Money. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Council on Articulation and Transfer, 2013.
Ontario Government, Reaching Higher: The McGuinty Government Plan for Postsecondary Education. Ontario: Ontario Government, 2010.
_____. Forging New Pathways to Improve Student Mobility in the Province of Ontario. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Council on Articulation and Transfer, 2013.
_____. ONCAT Project Status Report: Diploma to Degree System Transfer Pathways. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Council on Articulation and Transfer, 2013.
_____. “Public Relations (Ontario College Diploma) Program Standard”. Accessed May 14, 2014. http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/pepg/audiences/colleges/progstan/aa/50243.pdf.
_____. “Essential Employability Skills”. Accessed May 14, 2014. http://www.tcu.gov.on.ca/pepg/audiences/colleges/progstan/essential.html.
Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance. Quality Assurance Framework. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Universities Council on Quality Assurance, 2010.
“Quality Assurance in Ontario.” Accessed February 26, 2014, http://oucqa.ca/framework/1-2-quality-assurance-in-ontario/.
Rae, Bob. Ontario: A Leader in Learning. Report and Recommendations. Toronto, Ontario: Government of Ontario, 2005.
Shanahan, Theresa and Glen Jones. “Shifting Roles and Approaches: Government Coordination of Post-Secondary Education in Canada, 1995-2006.” Higher Education Research and Development 26, no. 1 (2007): 31-43.
Skolnik, Michael. (How) Do Quality Assurance Systems Accommodate the Differences between Academic and Applied Higher Education? (forthcoming).
Stensaker, Bjorn, Liv Langfeldt, Lee Harvey, Jeroen Huisman, and Don Westerheijden. “An in-Depth Study on the Impact of External Quality Assurance.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36, no. 4 (2011): 465-478.
Trampusch, Christine. “Europeanization and Institutional Change in Vocational Education and Training in Austria and Germany.” Governance 22, no. 3 (2009): 369-395.
Tremblay, Karine, Diane Lalancette, and Deborah Roseveare. AHELO: Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1: Design and Implementation. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2012.
Wagenaar, Robert. “Qualifications frameworks, Sectoral Profiles and Degree Programme Profiles in Higher Education.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education: New Profiles for New Societies 1, no. 1 (2013): 71-103.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
1. Authorship:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
3. Users:
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.