Global education: The need for innovative approach towards engaging intellectually brilliant students
Abstract
Education is recognized as a universal vehicle for the transmission of values’ and ideas’ for the development of the complete individual in connection to society’s changing reality. High-quality education can help individuals develop their minds and help society transform economically, socially, and politically. The quality of education provided to such individuals brings out intellectually brilliant students who need to be engaged in a way that will help them utilize their intellectual abilities. What then are the needs of intellectually brilliant students in today’s education? To probe further, the study explores the innovative approach to achieve the intellectually brilliant students’ needs. A qualitative approach was adopted for the study. Ten intellectually brilliant students were studied as case studies. Semi-structured 45-minute focus groups/interviews were conducted with the selected students, resulting in a total of 10 interviewees. Intellectually brilliant students need worldwide technological collaboration to grow their intellectual abilities to meet the needs of the world in terms of human resources, food security, job creation, infrastructure development, and social stability. Field teachers need tolerance, effort, and time to assess their own sentiments toward intellectually brilliant students and come up with teaching goals with them. Intellectually brilliant students need worldwide technological collaboration to grow their intellectual abilities to meet the needs of the world in terms of human resources, food security, job creation, infrastructure development, and social stability.
Received: 21 September 2022
Accepted: 20 April 2024
Downloads
References
Al-Samarraie, Hosam, and Shuhaila Hurmuzan. “A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education.” Thinking Skills and creativity 27 (2018): 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002.
Avvisati, Francesco, Gwenaël Jacotin, and Stéphan Vincent-Lancrin. “Educating higher education students for innovative economies: What international data tell us.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 1 (2013): 223-240.
Ball, Deborah Loewenberg, Mark Hoover Thames, and Geoffrey Phelps. “Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?” Journal of teacher education 59, no. 5 (2008): 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554.
Belash, Olga, Mikhail Popov, Nicolai Ryzhov, Yan Ryaskov, Sergey Shaposhnikov, and Mikhail Shestopalov. “Research on university education quality assurance: Methodology and results of stakeholders’ satisfaction monitoring.” Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 214, (2015): 344-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.658.
Benitti, Fabiane Barreto Vavassori. “Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review.” Computers & Education 58, no. 3 (2012): 978- 988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006.
Bergan, Sjur. “The European Higher Education Area: A road to the future or at way’s end?” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 6, no. 2 (2019): 23-49. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-6(2)-2019pp23-49.
Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison, Research methods in education. Routledge, (2002), https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342.
Crespí, Paula. “How higher education can develop generic competences?” IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education 6, no. 16 (2020): 23-29. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.616003.
Creswell, John W., Vicki L. Plano Clark, Michelle L. Gutmann, and William E. Hanson. “Advanced mixed methods research designs.” Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209, no.240, (2003): 209-240. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=F8BFOM8DCKoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA209&dq=Advanced+mixed+methods+research+designs.+&ots=gXbQyxuuQg&sig=MKe92aCzYK2Nb7wzelHfmRTroI0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Advanced%20mixed%20methods%20research%20designs.&f=false
Crossley, Michael, and Graham Vulliamy. Qualitative educational research in developing countries: current perspectives, Routledge (2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315889191.
Desimone, Laura M. “Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures.” Educational researcher 38, no. 3 (2009): 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
Eriksson, Helena, Sara Högdin, and Anna Isaksson. “Education and Career Choices: How the School Can Support Young People to Develop Knowledge and Decision-Making Skills.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 6, no. 9 (2018): 1900-1908. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060907.
Flick, Uwe. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Design, SAGE, (2022). https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5282289.
Ghazinoory, Sepehr, Shohreh Nasri, Fatemeh Ameri, Gholam Ali Montazer, and Ali Shayan. “Why do we need ‘Problem-oriented Innovation System (PIS)’for solving macro-level societal problems?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 150 (2020): 119749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119749.
Grigal, Meg, and Clare Papay. “The promise of postsecondary education for students with intellectual disability.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2018, no. 160 (2018): 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20301.
Hagedorn, Rebecca L., and Melissa D. Olfert. “Food insecurity and behavioral characteristics for academic success in young adults attending an Appalachian university.” Nutrients 10, no. 3 (2018): 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10030361.
Harris, Anne, and Leon R. De Bruin. “Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study.” Journal of Educational Change 19 (2018): 153-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2.
Hatley, Jenny. “Universal Values as a Barrier to the Effectiveness of Global Citizenship Education: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis.” International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning 11, no. 1 (2019): 87- 102. https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.11.1.06.
Ibad, Fareeda. “Personality and ability traits of teachers: student perceptions.” Journal of Education and Educational Development 5, no. 2 (2018). ERIC.
Kaufman, Alan S. Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. Guilford Publications, (2018). https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=JA1mDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Contemporary+intellectual+assessment:+Theories,+tests,+and+issues&ots=VBDHC3hLcv&sig=9LZGc02pfAUnAOYkd5nMBNs5JxU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Contemporary%20intellectual%20assessment%3A%20Theories%2C%20tests%2C%20and%20issues&f=false.
Keller, Melanie M., Knut Neumann, and Hans E. Fischer. “The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54, no. 5 (2017): 586-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21378.
Kelley, Todd R., and J. Geoff Knowles. “A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education.” International Journal of STEM education 3, no. 11 (2016): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
Koponen, Mika, Mervi A. Asikainen, Antti Viholainen, and Pekka E. Hirvonen. “How education affects mathematics teachers’ knowledge: Unpacking selected aspects of teacher knowledge.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13, no. 6 (2017): 1943-1980. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01209a.
Kuntz, Emily M., and Erik W. Carter. “Review of interventions supporting secondary students with intellectual disability in general education classes.” Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 44, no. 2 (2019): 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919847483.
Leinonen, Risto, Markku Haaranen, Mikko Kesonen, Mika Koponen, Pekka E. Hirvonen, and Mervi A. Asikainen. “Finnish Graduated Physics Teachers’ Views about Their Teacher Education Program: The Disparity between the Needs and Delivery.” Journal of technology and science education 10, no. 1 (2020): 101-116. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.820.
Madani, Rehaf A. “Analysis of Educational Quality, a Goal of Education for All Policy.” Higher Education Studies 9, no. 1 (2019): 100-109. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p100.
McCullough, Elizabeth A., Eva Y. Ma, Salwa Al-Noori, and Rebecca M. Price. “STEP forward: combining formal and informal education to develop communication skills that augment postdoctoral training.” Journal of STEM Outreach 3, no. 1 (2020): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v3i1.12
McMahon, Brenda J., and David Zyngier. “Student engagement: Contested concepts in two continents.” Research in comparative and international education 4, no. 2 (2009): 164-181. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2009.4.2.164.
Medina, Pablo, Natalia Ariza, Pablo Navas, Fernando Rojas, Gina Parody, Juan Alejandro Valdivia, Roberto Zarama, and Juan Felipe Penagos. “An unintended effect of financing the university education of the most brilliant and poorest Colombian students: The case of the intervention of the Ser Pilo Paga program.” Complexity 2018 (2018): 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3528206.
Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage, (1994): 27, https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=U4lU_-wJ5QEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR12&dq=Qualitative+data+analysis:+An+expanded+sourcebook&ots=kGTE3ETQWV&sig=8bPoEtMoQgdBCQ0JRV9yegt9g_I&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Qualitative%20data%20analysis%3A%20An%20expanded%20sourcebook&f=false.
Muassomah, Muassomah, Irwan Abdullah, Istiadah Istiadah, Anwar Mujahidin, Nurnaningsih Masnawi, and Sohrah Sohrah. “Believe in literature: character education for Indonesia’s youth.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 8, no. 6 (2020): 2223-2231. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080605.
Ndiomu, C. B. “Standard and the National Policy on Education associated hydra headed problem.” Quality in education. Benin-City: Supreme ideal publisher (1989), Benin City: Supreme Ideal International Ltd.
Ospennikova, Elena, Michael Ershov, and Ivan Iljin. “Educational robotics as an inovative educational technology.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 214, (2015): 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.588.
Pirmanova, Gavkhar Nazarkulovna, Musallam Akhmadovna Safarova, Zilola Farmonovna Khalilova, Nargiza Samartdinovna Tashpulatova, and Nodira Suyundikovna Normatova. “Development of intellectual and creative activity of teenagers in the study of historical and cultural monuments of England.” Linguistics and Culture Review 5, no. S2 (2021): 1346-1354, https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1820.
Prince, Michael J., and Richard M. Felder. “Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases.” Journal of engineering education 95, no. 2 (2006): 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.
Punch, Keith F. Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage, (2013): 154. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019425.
Ratana-Ubol, Archanya, and Weerachat Soopunyo. “Community network development for integrating non-formal education and informal education in schools.” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 42, no. 3 (2021): 558-563. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/253480.
Reid, Alan. “Climate change education and research: possibilities and potentials versus problems and perils?” Environmental Education Research 25, no. 6 (2019): 767-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1664075.
Sanders, Mark E. Stem, stem education, stemmania. (2008), 21. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/b5f37b87-c914-4e5a-8abc-f9b491dc2e36/content.
Satdykov, A. I., and B. A. Sazonov. “Recognition of qualifications obtained as a result of non-formal and informal learning: foreign experience and prospects for Russian practice.” Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii= Higher Education in Russia 29, no. 11 (2020): 98-111. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-98-111.
Shulman, Lee S. “Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.” Educational researcher 15, no. 2 (1986): 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004.
Shulman, Lee S. “Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.” Journal of Education 193, no. 3 (2013): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300302.
Shulman, Lee. “Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.” Harvard educational review 57, no. 1 (1987): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
Stake, Robert E. “Qualitative case studies.” In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466), (2005). Sage Publications Ltd.
Thambu, Nadarajan, Harun Joko Prayitno, and Gamal Abdul Nasir Zakaria. “Incorporating active learning into moral education to develop multiple intelligences: A qualitative approach.” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE) 3, no. 1 (2021): 17-29. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.10064.
Toh, Lai Poh Emily, Albert Causo, Pei-Wen Tzuo, I-Ming Chen, and Song Huat Yeo. “A review on the use of robots in education and young children.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19, no. 2 (2016): 148-163. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.2.148.
Van de Mortel, Thea F. “Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research.” Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, The 25, no. 4 (2008): 40-48. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.210155003844269.
Vandekinderen, Caroline, Griet Roets, Hilde Van Keer, and Rudi Roose. “Tackling social inequality and exclusion in education: From human capital to capabilities.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22, no. 1 (2018): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1362044.
Vescio, Vicki, Dorene Ross, and Alyson Adams. “A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning.” Teaching and teacher education 24, no. 1 (2008): 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004.
Wells, John G. Integrative STEM education at Virginia Tech: Graduate preparation for tomorrow’s leaders, (2013), 1. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/5168d010-69fa-46af-8767-0d410e0a793b/content.
Wells, John G. Integrative STEM education at Virginia Tech: Graduate preparation for tomorrow’s leaders, (2013), 1. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/5168d010-69fa-46af-8767-0d410e0a793b/content.
Wiliam, Dylan. “The role of formative assessment in effective learning environments.” The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (2010), 135-155.
Zander, Lysann, and Elisabeth Höhne. “Perceived peer exclusion as predictor of students’ help-seeking strategies in higher education.” Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 53, no. 1-2 (2021): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000235.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
1. Authorship:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
3. Users:
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.