The attitude of students and teachers towards MOOC usage for their academic and professional development: A comparative study of two case study sites
The massive open online course (MOOC) and online learning concepts have received a lot of attention from educational stakeholders all around the world as a result of COVID-19. Initial studies demonstrated that people may use MOOCs as a tool for academic and professional advancement. This micro-study was conducted at two adjacent national higher educational institutions (HEIs) in India as case study sites (CSS) to learn more about the attitude of the students and faculties there. The research strategy used for the study was a mixed-method approach. To collect data, a tool that was created by the researchers was used. There was a type of atypical relationship between the institutions and the professionals. Comparing CSS2 students and CSS1 teachers to their peers from other institutions, it was discovered that they both displayed more optimistic attitude. The attitude of all four groups were discovered to be favorable. The study served as an example of some educational ramifications in the neighborhoods.
Received: 9 June 2022
Accepted: 15 April 2023
Barger, Runchana Pam. “Democratization of Education through Massive Open Online Courses in Asia.” IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education 8, no. 2 (2020): 29-46. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1265753.
Cattaneo, Alberto A. P., Chiara Antonietti, and Martina Rauseo. “How Digitalised Are Vocational Teachers? Assessing Digital Competence in Vocational Education and Looking at its Underlying Factors.” Computers & Education 176, (2022): 104358-104375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104358.
Commonwealth of Learning. Policy Brief: Leveraging MOOCs for Teacher Development in Low-Income Countries and Disadvantaged Regions. November, 2021: 1-16. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/3980.
de Jong, Peter G. M., James D. Pickering, Renee A. Hendriks, Bronwen J. Swinnerton, Fereshte Goshtasbpour, and Marlies E. J. Reinders. “Twelve Tips for Integrating Critical Studies in Language and Literature 2, no. 6 (2021): 38-51, https://jcsll.gta.org.uk/ index.php/home/article/view/123.
Massive Open Online Course Content into Classroom Teaching.” Medical Teacher 42, no. 4 (2020): 393-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1571569.
Dey, Sanjay, Amita Patra, Dillip Giri, and Viswanath Reddy. “A study on the Effectiveness of Online Mode of Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic through the Awareness and Attitude of Teachers.” Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary 7, no. 1 (January, 2022): 5-25. https://rrjournals.com/index.php/rrijm/article/view/48/33.
Donitsa-Schmidt, Smadar, Rony Ramot, and BeverleyTopaz. “Shaping the Future of Distance Learning in Teacher Education: MOOCS during COVID-19.” Perspectives in Education 40, no. 1 (2022): 250-267. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie/article/view/5258.
Edelsbrunner, Sarah, Karin Steiner, Sandra Schön, Martin Ebner, and Philipp Leitner. “Promoting Digital Skills for Austrian Employees through a MOOC: Results and Lessons Learned from Design and Implementation.” Education Sciences 12, (2022): 89-105. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/2/89.
Giordano, Michela, and Maria Antonietta Marongiu. “We Are a Global Community’: Communicating Knowledge through MOOCs and Teacher Training Platforms.” Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature 2, no. 6 (2021): 38-51. https://jcsll.gta.org.uk/index.php/home/article/view/123.
Goglio, Valentina. “The Diffusion and Social Implications of MOOCs A Comparative Study of the USA and Europe.” Routledge, 2022: 207-221. https://www. taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9781003009757-12/conclusions-valentina-goglio.
Henderikx, Maartje A., Karel Kreijns, and Marco Kalz. “Refining Success and Dropout in Massive Open Online Courses Based on the Intention–Behavior Gap.” Distance Education 38, no. 3 (2017): 353-368. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006.
Hertz, Benjamin, Hannah Grainger Clemson, Daniella Tasic Hansen, Diana Laurillard, Madeleine Murray, Luis Fernandes, Anne Gilleran, Diego Rojas Ruiz, and Danguole Rutkauskiene. “A Pedagogical Model for Effective Online Teacher Professional Development—Findings from the Teacher Academy Initiative of the European Commission.” European Journal of Education 57, (2022): 142–159. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.12486.
Kundu, Arnab, and Tripti Bej. “Perceptions of MOOCs among Indian State University Students and Teachers.” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 12, no. 5 (2020): 1095-1115. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JARHE-08-2019-0224/full/html.
Lam, Joseph Hin Yan, and Shelley Xiuli Tong. “Development and Validation of the Online Learning Attitude Questionnaire (OLAQ) among Primary School Children and Caregivers.” Interactive Learning Environments, (2022): 1-15. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10494820.2022.2043911.
Makransky, Guido, Righard E. Mayer, Nocola Veitch, Michelle Hood, Karl Bang Christensen, and Helen Gadegaard. “Equivalence of Using a Desktop Virtual
Reality Science Simulation at Home and in Class.” Plos One 14, no. 4 (2019): e0214944. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214944.
Ma, Ning, Ya-Meng Li, Jia-Hui Guo, Diana Laurillard, and Min Yang. “A Learning Model for Improving In-Service Teachers’ Course Completion in MOOCs.” Interactive Learning Environments, (2022): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2025405.
Marta-Lazo, Carmen, Sara Osuna-Acedo, and Javier Gil-Quintana. “sMOOC: A Pedagogical Model for Social Inclusion.” Heliyon 5, no. 3 (2019): e01326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01326.
Martin, Michaela, and Ana Godonoga. “SDG 4 - Policies for Flexible Learning Pathways in Higher Education.” IIEP-UNESCO Working Papers (2020): 1-52. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372817?locale=en.
Meinert, Edward, Abrar Alturkistani, David Brindley, Alison Carter, Glenn Wells, and Josip Car. “Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Massive Open Online Course on Real World Evidence.” BMJ Open 8, no. 8 (2018): e025188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025188.
Misra, Pradeep Kumar. “MOOCs for Teacher Professional Development: Reflections and Suggested Actions.” Open Praxis 10, no. 1 (2018): 67–77. https://openpraxis. org/article/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.780/.
Mittal, Pankaj. “Creating Future Ready Universities the Indian Context.” In Reimagining Indian Universities, eds. Pankaj Mittal and Sistla Rama Devi Pani. 1-19. New Delhi: Association of Indian Universities, 2020. https://www.aiu. ac.in/documents/AIU_Publications/Reimagining%20Indian%20 Universities/8.%20Creating%20Future%20Ready%20Universities%20The%20 Indian%20Context%20By%20Pankaj%20Mittal%20Secretary%20 General,%20Association%20Of%20Indian%20Universities,%20New%20Delhi.pdf.
Nemer, David, and Jacki O’Neill. “Rethinking MOOCs: The Promises for Better Education in India.” International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development (IJICTHD) 11, no. 1 (2019): 36-50. https://www.igi-global.com/article/rethinking-moocs/221310.
Neuwirth, Lorenz S., Svetlana Jovic, and B Runi Mukherji. “Reimagining Higher Education During and Post-COVID-19: Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Adult and Continuing Education 27, no. 2 (2021): 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1477971420947738.
Ospina-Delgado, Julieth E., María A. García-Benau, and Ana Zorio-Grima. “Learning IFRS through MOOC: Student and Graduate Perceptions.” Accounting Education 30, no. 5 (2021): 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1925131.
Ozdal, Hasan, Celalettin Ozden, Ramazan Atasoy, and Ahmet Guneyli. “Effectiveness of Self-Regulated Learning Skills on WebBased Instruction Attitudes in Online Environments.” Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction 12, no. 1 (2022): 182-193. View of Effectiveness of self-regulated Learning skills on web-based instruction attitudes in online environments (pegegog.net).
Pappano, Laura. “The Year of the MOOC.” New York Times. November 2, 2012. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html.
Pischetola, Magda. “Teaching Novice Teachers to Enhance Learning in the Hybrid University.” Postdigital Science and Education 4, (2022): 70–92. https://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s42438-021-00257-1.
Santandreu Calonge, David, and Mariam Aman Shah. “MOOCs, Graduate Skills Gaps, and Employability: A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Literature.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL 17 no. 5 (2016): 67-90. https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/irrodl/2016-v17-n5-irrodl04876/1064705ar.pdf.
Sanzgiri, Janesh. “MOOCs for Development? A Study of Indian Learners and Their Experiences in Massive Open Online Courses.” Ph. D. diss., The Open University, 2020. https://www.proquest.com/openview/e5bc1153640ddb559a4290282edcc56a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.
Sayaf, Amer Mutrik, Mahdi M. Alamri, Mohammed Ayid Alqahtani, and Waleed Mugahed Alrahmi. “Factors Influencing University Students’ Adoption of Digital Learning Technology in Teaching and Learning.” Sustainability 14, (2022): 493-510. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/493.
Tomczyk, Łukas, Vladimir Costas Jáuregui, Cibelle Albuquerque de La Higuera Amato, Darwin Muñoz, Magali Arteaga, Solomon Sunday Oyelere, Özgür Yaşar Akyar, and Mariana Porta. “Are Teachers Techno-optimists or Techno- pessimists? A Pilot Comparative among Teachers in Bolivia, Brazil, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Finland, Poland, Turkey, and Uruguay.” Education and Information Technologies 26, (2021): 2715–2741. https://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-020-10380-4.
UNESCO, Teacher Task Force, and ILO. Supporting Teachers in Back-to-School Efforts Guidance for Policy-Makers. May, 2020: 1-5. https://teachertaskforce.org/knowledge-hub/supporting-teachers-back-school-efforts-guidance-policy-makers.
University Grants Commission. Massive Open Online Courses an Initiative under National Mission on Education through Information Communication Technology (NME-ICT) Programme. F. No. 8-1/2015-TEL. March 11, 2016a: https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/3885329_MOOCs-Guideline-(Development--Funding).pdf.
University Grants Commission. UGC (Credit Framework for Online Learning Courses through SWAYAM) Regulation, 2016. No. F.1-100/2016 (MOOCs/e- content). July 20, 2016b: https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/0272836_moocs.pdf.
Venkataraman, Balaji, and Kanwar, Asha. “Changing the Tune: MOOCs for Human Development? – A Case Study.” In MOOCs and Open Education Around the World, eds. Curtis J. Bonk, Mimi Miyoung Lee, Thomas C. Reeves, Thomas H. Reynolds, 27. Routledge, 2015. https://www.routledge.com/MOOCs-and-Open-Education-Around-the-World/Bonk-Lee-Reeves-Reynolds/p/book/9781138807419.
Wang, Mo, Minjuan Wang, Yulu Cui, and Hai Zhang. “Art Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Online Learning: An Empirical Study Using Self Determination Theory.” Frontiers in Psychology 12, (2021): 627095. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.627095.
Wu, Bing, and Wei Chen. “Factors Affecting MOOC Teacher Effectiveness from the Perspective of Professional Capital.” Behaviour & Information Technology, (2022): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.2024596.
Zhang, Meng, and Sitong Chen. “Modeling Dichotomous Technology Use among University EFL Teachers in China: The Roles of TPACK, Affective and Evaluative Attitudes towards Technology.” Cogent Education 9, no. 1 (2022): 2013396-2013420. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2013396.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.