Exploring the impact of generational differences on university study decisions in Slovakia
Students whose parents did not study at a university (first-generation students) exhibit differences in how they decide whether and what to study, compared to students whose parents attended university. In our study, we looked for possible similarities and differences between these two groups of students. The participants were Slovak students aged from 18 to 22 (N = 357). The data were collected using an online questionnaire. The results showed that it was significantly more important for second-generation students, whose parents had university degree experience, to continue the family tradition when deciding to study than for first-generation students. The results also revealed that the internet is the most important source of information for students when choosing the subject of their studies. At present, higher education institutions strongly compete for students and, consequently, we recommend that universities pay attention to different target groups of students and develop intervention programs aimed at retaining them. It is equally important that universities keep up with the times and provide relevant information on their websites in today’s digital world.
Received: 8 March 2022
Accepted: 16 April 2023
Atherton, Matthew C. ‘Academic Preparedness of First-Generation College Students: Different Perspectives’. Journal of College Student Development 55, no. 8 (2014): 824–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0081.
Brown, Robert M., and Timothy William Mazzarol. ‘The Importance of Institutional Image to Student Satisfaction and Loyalty within Higher Education’. Higher Education 58, no. 1 (July 2009): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9183-8.
Capannola, Amanda L., and Elizabeth I. Johnson. ‘On Being the First: The Role of Family in the Experiences of First-Generation College Students’. Journal of Adolescent Research 37, no. 1 (January 2022): 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558420979144.
Choy, Susan P. Students Whose Parents Did Not Go to College: Postsecondary Access, Persistence, and Attainment. U.S. Department of Education, 2001. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001072_Essay.pdf.
Collier, Peter J., and David L. Morgan. ‘“Is That Paper Really Due Today?”: Differences in First-Generation and Traditional College Students’ Understandings of Faculty Expectations’. Higher Education 55, no. 4 (April 2008): 425–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9065-5.
Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. ‘Motivation, Personality, and Development Within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview of Self-Determination Theory’. In The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, by Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan, 84–108. edited by Richard M. Ryan. Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006.
Dowling-Hetherington, Linda. ‘Transnational Higher Education and the Factors Influencing Student Decision-Making: The Experience of an Irish University’. Journal of Studies in International Education 24, no. 3 (July 2020): 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319826320.
Faul, Franz, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, and Axel Buchner. ‘G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences’. Behavior Research Methods 39, no. 2 (May 2007): 175–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.
Froggé, George M., and Kathryn H. Woods. ‘Characteristics and Tendencies of First and Second-Generation University Students’. College Quarterly 21, no. 2 (2018). http://collegequarterly.ca/2018-vol21-num02-spring/characteristics-and-tendencies-of-first-and-second-generation-university-students.html.
Glass, Leah E. ‘Social Capital and First-Generation College Students: Examining the Relationship Between Mentoring and College Enrollment’. Education and Urban Society 55, no. 2 (February 2023): 143–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245221076097.
Gulatt, Yvette, and Wendy Jan. How Do Pre-Collegiate Academic Outreach Programs Impact College-Going among Underrepresented Students. Pathways to College Network Clearinghouse, 2003.
Horn, Laura, and Anne-Marie Nuñez. Mapping the Road to College: First-Generation Students’ Math Track, Planning Strategies, and Context of Support. National Center for Education Statistics, 2000. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000153.pdf.
Ives, Jillian, and Milagros Castillo-Montoya. ‘First-Generation College Students as Academic Learners: A Systematic Review’. Review of Educational Research 90, no. 2 (April 2020): 139–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319899707.
James, Richard. ‘Non-Traditional Students and Their University Participation: An Australian Perspective on Persistent Inequities and the New Ideology of Student Choice.’ 21st European Association of Institutional Research, 1999.
Keppens, Gil, Simon Boone, Els Consuegra, Ilse Laurijssen, Bram Spruyt, and Filip Van Droogenbroeck. ‘First-Generation College Students’ Motives to Start University Education: An Investment in Self- Development, One’s Economic Prospects or to Become a Role Model?’ YOUNG, 30 January 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/11033088221139393.
Khoo, Benjamin KS. ‘Mobile Applications in Higher Education: Implications for Teaching and Learning’. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education 15, no. 1 (January 2019): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2019010106.
Le, Tri D., Linda J. Robinson, and Angela R. Dobele. ‘Understanding High School Students Use of Choice Factors and Word-of-Mouth Information Sources in University Selection’. Studies in Higher Education 45, no. 4 (2 April 2020): 808–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564259.
Machovcová, Kateřina, Taťána Škanderová, and Barbora Zumrová. ‘Studující První Generace v Procesu Tranzice Do Vysokoškolského Studia [First-Generation Students in the Process of Transition into University Studies]’. In Punk v Kvalitativním Výzkumu Aneb „Kvalita Is Not Dead“, edited by Alena Hricová, 31. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, 2023.
McPherson, Rebecca. ‘Low-Qualified Labors’ Job Mobility, Boundary Crossing, and Career Success: A Cross-Industry HRM Perspective’. Journal of Organizational Psychology 18, no. 1 (2018): 116–29.
Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic. ‘Školné Na Vysokých Školách v SR’. Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of Slovak Republic, 2022. https://www.minedu.sk/skolne-na-vysokych-skolach-v-sr/#VVSDF.
Nathan, Alan B. ‘Does Upward Bound Have an Effect on Student Educational Outcomes? A Reanalysis of the Horizons Randomized Controlled Trial Study’. The University of Wisconsin, 2013. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1355756348.
Pike, Gary R., and George D. Kuh. ‘First- and Second-Generation College Students: A Comparison of Their Engagement and Intellectual Development’. The Journal of Higher Education 76, no. 3 (2005): 276–300. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0021.
Robson, Colin. Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings. 3. ed. Chichester: Wiley, 2011.
Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. ‘Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.’ American Psychologist 55, no. 1 (2000): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Simões, Cláudia, and Ana Maria Soares. ‘Applying to Higher Education: Information Sources and Choice Factors’. Studies in Higher Education 35, no. 4 (June 2010): 371–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903096490.
Sojkin, Bogdan, Paweł Bartkowiak, and Agnieszka Skuza. ‘Changes in Students’ Choice Determinants in Poland: A Comparative Study of Tertiary Business Education between 2008 and 2013’. Higher Education 69, no. 2 (February 2015): 209–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9770-9.
Sojkin, Bogdan, Paweł Bartkowiak, and Agnieszka Skuza. ‘Determinants of Higher Education Choices and Student Satisfaction: The Case of Poland’. Higher Education 63, no. 5 (May 2012): 565–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9459-2.
Tate, Kevin A., William Caperton, Dakota Kaiser, Nathan T. Pruitt, Heather White, and Eric Hall. ‘An Exploration of First-Generation College Students’ Career Development Beliefs and Experiences’. Journal of Career Development 42, no. 4 (August 2015): 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845314565025.
Terenzini, Patrick T., Leonard Springer, Patricia M. Yaeger, Ernest T. Pascarella, and Amaury Nora. ‘First-Generation College Students: Characteristics, Experiences, and Cognitive Development’. Research in Higher Education 37, no. 1 (February 1996): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680039.
Toutkoushian, Robert K., Robert A. Stollberg, and Kelly A. Slaton. ‘Talking ‘Bout My Generation: Defining “First-Generation College Students” in Higher Education Research’. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 120, no. 4 (April 2018): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000407.
Willis, Gordon B. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2005.
Yang, Chia-chen. ‘Similar Patterns, Different Implications: First-Generation and Continuing College Students’ Social Media Use and Its Association With College Social Adjustment’. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 24, no. 1 (May 2022): 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025120902755.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.