Achievement emotions of university students in on-campus and online education during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Feelings and emotions play a prominent role in the motivation and academic performance of students. Considering this importance, this study aimed to compare the achievement emotions of students in two educational environments, traditional face-to-face classes and online classes, grown after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this goal, 92 university students who had the experience of the two modes of education evaluated their emotions in these contexts. The findings indicated that university students had better class-related and learning-related feelings (enjoyment, hope, and pride) in traditional face-to-face education. These students also reported feeling angrier in online classes. Differences in other emotions, such as anxiety, hopelessness, boredom, and shame, were not significant. Test-related emotions of students were rather similar in these two educational contexts. Although traditional face-to-face education produced more positive emotions in students, 29.7% of the students preferred to continue their studies in online mode. Blended education can help students make optimum use of available resources. The findings can be of use to educational policymakers, curriculum planners, teachers, and students.
Received: 31 January 2022
Accepted: 19 October 2022
Downloads
References
Baek, Youngkyun, and Achraf Touati. 2017. “Exploring How Individual Traits Influence Enjoyment in a Mobile Learning Game.” Computers in Human Behavior 69: 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.053.
Barrot, Jessie S., Ian I. Llenares, and Leo S. Del Rosario. 2021.”Students’ Online Learning Challenges during the Pandemic and How They Cope with Them: The Case of the Philippines.” Education and Information Technologies 26, no. 6: 7321–7338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x.
Beck, Gary L. 2011. “Investigation of the Relationship between Achievement Emotions and Academic Performance in Medical Students.” PhD diss., Capella University, Minneapolis.
Bieleke, Maik, Katarzyna Gogol, Thomas Goetz, Lia Daniels, and Reinhard Pekrun. 2021. “The AEQ-S: A Short Version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 65: 101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101940.
Brown, Byron W., and Carl E. Liedholm. 2002. “Teaching microeconomic principles.” American Economic Review, 92, 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320191778.
Camacho-Morles, Jesús, Gavin R. Slemp, Reinhard Pekrun, Kristina Loderer, Hanchao Hou, and Lindsay G. Oades. 2021. “Activity Achievement Emotions and Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Psychology Review 33 (3): 1051–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3.
DePoy, Elizabeth, and Laura N. Gitlin. 2019. Introduction to Research E-book: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Enkin, Elizabeth, and Errapel Mejías-Bikandi. 2015. “The Effectiveness of Online Teaching in an Advanced Spanish Language Course.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27 (1): 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12112.
Figlio, David, Mark Rush, and Lu Yin. 2013. “Is It Live or Is It Internet? Experimental Estimates of the Effects of Online Instruction on Student Learning.” Journal of Labor Economics 31 (4): 763–84. https://doi.org/10.1086/669930.
Gherheș, Vasile, Claudia E. Stoian, Marcela Alina Fărcașiu, and Miroslav Stanici. 2021. “E-Learning vs. Face-to-Face Learning: Analyzing Students’ Preferences and Behaviors.” Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381.
Goertler, Senta, and Adam Gacs. 2018. “Assessment in Online German: Assessment Methods and Results.” Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 51 (2): 156– 174. https://doi.org/10.1111/tger.12071.
Goetz, Thomas, and Nathan C. Hall. 2013. “Emotion and Achievement in the Classroom.” In International Guide to Student Achievement, edited by John Hattie and Eric M. Anderman, 192–195. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jirásek, Ivo, and Bohuslav Stránský. 2022. “Revealing Invisibility: Interpreting Social and Behavioral Aspects of the Coronavirus Pandemic through Student Documentary Photography”. Tuning Journal for Higher Education 9 (2), 217– 44. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2185.
Kaupp, Ray. 2012. “Online penalty: The impact of Online Instruction on the LatinoWhite Achievement Gap.” Journal of Applied Research in the Community College 12 (2), 1–9.
König, Johannes, Daniela J. Jaeger-Biela, and Nina Glutsch. 2020. “Adapting to Online Teaching during COVID-19 School Closure: Teacher Education and Teacher Competence Effects among Early Career Teachers in Germany.” European Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (4). S. 608 –623. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650.
Lei, Man, and Jane Medwell. 2021. “Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Student Teachers: How the Shift to Online Collaborative Learning Affects Student Teachers’ Learning and Future Teaching in a Chinese Context.” Asia Pacific Education Review 22: 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09686-w.
Li, Sijia, Yilin Wang, Jia Xue, Nan Zhao, and Tingshao Zhu. 2020. “The Impact of COVID-19 Epidemic Declaration on Psychological Consequences: A Study on Active Weibo Users”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (6): 2032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062032.
Linnenbrink, Elizabeth A. 2007. “The Role of Affect in Student Learning: A MultiDimensional Approach to Considering the Interaction of Affect, Motivation, and Engagement.” In Emotion in Education, edited by Paul A. Schutz and Reinhart Pekrun, 107–124. Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978012372545-5/50008-3.
Mathrani, Anuradha, Tarushikha Sarvesh, and Rahila Umer. 2021. “Digital Divide Framework: Online Learning in Developing Countries during the COVID-19 Lockdown.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 1–16. https://doi.org/10.10 80/14767724.2021.1981253.
Parker, Kim, Amanda Lenhart, and Kathleen Moore. 2011. “The Digital Revolution and Higher Education: College Presidents, Public Differ on Value of Online Learning.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2011/08/28/the-digital-revolution-and-higher-education-2/.
Pekrun, Reinhard. 2005. “Progress and Open Problems in Educational Emotion Research.” Learning and Instruction 15 (5): 497–506. https://doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.014.
Pekrun, Reinhard. 2006. “The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice.” Educational Psychology Review 18 (4): 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
Pekrun, Reinhard. 2019. “Achievement Emotions: A Control-Value Theory Perspective.” In Emotions in Late Modernity, edited by Roger Patulny, Alberto Bellocchi, Rebecca E. Olson, Sukhmani Khorana, Jordan McKenzie, and Michelle Peterie, 142–157. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351133319-13.
Pekrun, Reinhard, Anne C. Frenzel, Thomas Goetz, and Raymond P. Perry. 2007. “The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: An Integrative Approach to Emotions in Education.” In Emotion in Education edited by Paul A. Schutz and Reinhart Pekrun, 13–36. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
Pekrun, Reinhard, Thomas Goetz, Anne C. Frenzel, Petra Barchfeld, and Raymond P. Perry. 2011. “Measuring Emotions in Students’ Learning and Performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ).” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (1): 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.
Pekrun, Reinhard, Thomas Goetz, and Raimond P. Perry. 2005. “Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). User’s Manual.” University of Munich, Munich.
Pekrun, Reinhard, Thomas Goetz, Wolfram Titz, and Raymond P. Perry. 2002. “Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” Educational Psychologist 37 (2): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4.
Pekrun, Reinhard, Stephanie Lichtenfeld, Herbert W. Marsh, Kou Murayama, and Thomas Goetz. 2017. “Achievement Emotions and Academic Performance: Longitudinal Models of Reciprocal Effects.” Child Development 88 (5): 1653– 70. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12704.
Pekrun, Reinhard, and Elizabeth J. Stephens. 2010. “Achievement Emotions: A ControlValue Approach: Achievement Emotions.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (4): 238–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00259.x.
Ranellucci, John, Nathan C. Hall, and Thomas Goetz. 2015. “Achievement Goals, Emotions, Learning, and Performance: A Process Model.” Motivation Science 1 (2): 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000014.
Rubio, Fernando, Jonathan M. Thomas, and Qin Li. 2018. “The Role of Teaching Presence and Student Participation in Spanish Blended Courses.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 31 (3): 226–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1372481.
Salmon, Gilly. 2013. E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning. Routledge.
Stephan, Melanie, Stefan Markus, and Michaela Gläser-Zikuda. 2019. “Students’ Achievement Emotions and Online Learning in Teacher Education.” Frontiers in Education 4 (October): 109. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00109.
Tannert, Swantje, and Alexander Gröschner. 2021. “Joy of Distance Learning? How Student Self-Efficacy and Emotions Relate to Social Support and School Environment.” European Educational Research Journal 20(4): 498–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211024784.
Turner, Jeannine E., and Diane L. Schallert. 2001. “Expectancy–Value Relationships of Shame Reactions and Shame Resiliency.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2): 320–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.320.
Tze, Virginia M. C., Lia M. Daniels, and Robert M. Klassen. 2016. “Evaluating the
Relationship between Boredom and Academic Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.” Educational Psychology Review 28 (1): 119–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648015-9301-y.
Varma, Prerna, Moira Junge, Hailey Meaklim, and Melinda L. Jackson. 2021. “Younger People Are More Vulnerable to Stress, Anxiety and Depression during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global Cross-Sectional Survey.” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 109 (July): 110236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110236.
Wu, D. Derek. “Online Learning in Postsecondary Education: A Review of the Empirical Literature (2013-2014).” Ithaka S+R. Last Modified 11 March 2015. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.221027.
Zarei, Soraya, and Shahriar Mohammadi. 2021.“Challenges of Higher Education Related to E-learning in Developing Countries during COVID-19 Spread: A Review of the Perspectives of Students, Instructors, Policymakers, and ICT Experts.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 1– 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14647-2.
Zeidner, Moshe. 1998. Test Anxiety: The State of the Art: Perspectives on Individual Differences. New York: Plenum Press.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
1. Authorship:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
3. Users:
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.