Researchers’ perceptions of COVID-19 impact on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)-based practices and society’s view of science in the first months of the pandemic
Abstract
Over the last decade, national and international agencies have repeatedly called for research practices aligned with the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), with varied effects on different disciplines and countries. The COVID-19 pandemic made this need even more critical. This study aimed to explore whether and how, from researchers’ point of view, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in RRI-based research practices in the different disciplines and, more generally, society’s perception of science. 1499 researchers in the three Catalan-speaking regions of Spain responded to an online questionnaire in the first months of the pandemic. Results showed that while only half perceived an impact on RRI-based practices, this proportion was higher for Health Sciences and Social Sciences researchers in all the dimensions. Most researchers perceived a positive impact on societal actors’ views of science, although researchers in the Humanities were more sceptical than those in other disciplines. The analysis of open-ended questions revealed researchers from all disciplines were also concerned about fake news and claimed that researchers’ working conditions and research funding across all disciplines needed to be improved for future research to be capable of coping with current and future challenges.
Received: 31 December 2021
Accepted: 29 September 2022
Downloads
References
Haoran Chu, Shupei Yuan, and Sixiao Liu. 2021. “Call them COVIDiots: Exploring the effects of aggressive communication style and psychological distance in the communication of COVID-19.” Public Understanding of Science 30(3): 240– 257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521989191.
European Commission. n.d. “Responsible research & innovation”. Accessed July 20, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation.
European Commission. 2020. “Spain Horizon 2020 country profile.” Accessed July 10, 2021. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/dashboard/extensions/CountryProfile/CountryProfile.html?Country=Spain.
European Commission. 2021. “European innovation scoreboard 2021 – Spain.” Accessed July 10, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/innovation/scoreboards_en.
Kris Hartley and Minh Khuong Vu. 2020. “Fighting fake news in the COVID-19 era: policy insights from an equilibrium model.” Policy Sciences 53(4): 735-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09405-z.
Helen Kara and Su-ming Khoo. 2020. Researching in the Age of COVID-19, Volume III: Creativity and Ethics. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447360438.
Jenny J. Lee and John P. Haupt. 2021. “Scientific collaboration on COVID-19 amidst geopolitical tensions between the US and China.” The Journal of Higher Education 92(2): 303-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1827924.
Hang Lu, Haoran Chu, and Yanni Ma. 2021. “Experience, experts, statistics, or just science? Predictors and consequences of reliance on different evidence types during the COVID-19 infodemic.” Public Understanding of Science 30(5): 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211009685.
Nicole Lurie, Gerald T. Keusch, and Victor J. Dzau. 2021. “Urgent lessons from COVID 19: why the world needs a standing, coordinated system and sustainable financing for global research and development.” The Lancet 397: 1229-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00503-1.
Niels Mejlgaard, Carter Bloch, and Emil Bargmann Madsen. 2019. “Responsible research and innovation in Europe: A cross-country comparative analysis.” Science and Public Policy 46(2): 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy048.
OECD. 2021. Main Science and Technology Indicators, Volume 2020, Issue 2. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0bd49050-en.
Senja Post, Nils Bienzeisler, and Mareike Lohöfener. 2021. “A desire for authoritative science? How citizens’ informational needs and epistemic beliefs shaped their views of science, news, and policymaking in the COVID-19 pandemic.” Public Understanding of Science 30(5): 496-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211005334.
Chantelle Rijs and Frederick Fenter. 2020. “The academic response to COVID-19.” Frontiers in Public Health 8: 621563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.621563.
Sander Van Der Linden, Jon Roozenbeek, and Josh Compton. 2020. “Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19.” Frontiers in Psychology 11:566790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790.
Deedra Vargo, Lin Zhu, Briana Benwell, and Zheng Yan. 2021. “Digital technology use during COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 3(1): 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.242.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
1. Authorship:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
3. Users:
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.