An investigation of mission differentiation and specialization in Turkish universities in the context of strategic objectives
Abstract
This study examines and compares the strategic objectives of the universities included in the “mission differentiation and specialization on the basis of regional development” project carried out in the Turkish higher education system and well-established universities in Turkiye. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine how the goal of “mission differentiation and specialization on the basis of regional development” is tried to be realized in the higher education system and whether this goal really brings a difference to the activities of universities. The study was conducted through document review. The universities included in the study were determined by criterion sampling and two different study groups were formed for comparison. The first study group consisted of the universities involved in the mission differentiation project. The second study group consisted of the well-established universities located in various geographical regions of Turkiye. Data were analyzed through the content analysis. The strategic objectives of the universities were examined under the themes of increasing quality in education, increasing the quantity and quality of scientific research, improvement of communication and interaction with stakeholders, strengthening of corporate identity/structure/ensuring institutionalization and internationalization. The strategic objectives of the universities with mission differentiation are also analyzed in terms of leading local and regional development. The results of the research show that universities subject to mission differentiation and well-established universities have different qualifications only in terms of “leading local and regional development” and “strengthening community service studies.” However, there are also points where goals and performance indicators depending on these strategic objectives are resembled. The similarities in the strategic objectives of the universities show that the missions of the universities with mission differentiation and specialization should first be clarified based on a general framework provided by the Council of Higher Education. In line with the guiding framework, universities should establish their unique strategic objectives in the strategic planning process in order to contribute to regional development.
Received: 20 October2021
Accepted: 7 October 2022
Downloads
References
Alemu, Sintayehu Kassaye. “The Meaning, Idea and History of University/ Higher Education in Africa: A Brief Literature Review.” Forum For International Research in Education 4, no.3 (2018): 210-227.
Alger, Jonathan R. “The Educational Value of Diversity.” Academe 83, no.1 (1997): 20-23.
Altbach, Philip G. “The Past, Present, and Future of the Research University.” In The Rood to Academic Excellence: The Making of World-Class Research Universities, edited by Philip G. Altbach, and Jamil Salmi, 11-32. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2011.
Altbach, Philip G., and Robert O. Berdahl. Higher Education in American Society, rev. ed., Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1981. Quoted in Thomas J. Denham, “A Brief History of the Major Components of the Medieval Settings.” PhD diss., Nova Southeastern University, 2002.
Altbach, Philip, G., and Todd M. Davis. “Global Challenge and National Response: Note for an International Dialogue on Higher Education.” International Higher Education 14 (Winter 1999):2-5. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.1999.14.6471.
Altbach, Philip, G. “The Complex Role of Universities in the Period of Globalization.” Accessed August 9, 2021. https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2099/8111/altbach.pdf.
Altunoğlu, Asu, “Yükseköğretimde Kapsayıcılığın Uygulanabilirliği Üzerine Bir Tartışma [Applicability of Inclusiveness in Higher Education].” OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi 16, no: 27, (2020): 672-699.
Bardach, Eugene, and Eric M. Patashnik. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2009.
Bennett, Roger, and Rehnuma Ali-Choudhury. “Components of the University Brand: An Empirical Study.” Paper presentation at the 3rd Annual Colloquium of the Academy of Marketing’s Brand, Corporate Identity and Reputation SIG, Brunel University, September 2007.
Boulton, Geoffrey, and Colin Lucas. “What are Universities For?” Chinese Science Bulletin 56, no. 23 (2011): 2506-2517.
Bowen, Glenn A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (2009): 27-40.
Burrows, Joanne. “Going Beyond Labels: A Framework for Profiling Institutional Stakeholders.” Contemporary Education 70, no. 4 (1999): 5–10.
Çetinsaya, Gökhan, “Büyüme, Kalite, Uluslararasılaşma: Türkiye Yükseköğretimi İçin bir Yol Haritası [Growth, Quality, Internationalization: A Roadmap for Higher Education in Turkey].” Yükseköğretim Kurulu Raporu, 2014.
Chatterton, Paul, and John Goddard. “The Response of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Needs.” European Journal of Education 35, no. 4 (2000): 475-497.
Christian, Thune. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 2005.
Çiftçi, Münevver, “Girişimci Üniversite ve Üçüncü Kuşak Üniversiteler [The Entrepreneur University and Third Generation Universities].” Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 27 (2010): 1-5.
Connelly, Lynne, M. “Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research.” Medsurg Nursing 25, no. 6 (2016): 435-437.
Corbetta, Piergiorgio. Social Research: Theory, Methods and Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003.
Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (US). Recognition of Accrediting Organizations: Policy and Procedures. Washington: Council for Higher Education Accreditation, 2006. Accessed August 12, 2021. https://www.chea.org/sites/default/files/other-content/Recognition-Policy-2006.pdf.
Council of Higher Education of Turkey (YÖK). Bölgesel Kalkınma Odaklı Misyon Farklılaşması ve İhtisaslaşma Programı: Proje Hakkında [The Program of Mission Differentiation and Specialization on the Basis of Regional Development: About the Project]. Accessed August 12, 2021. https://bolgeselkalkinma.yok.gov.tr/hakkinda/proje-hakkinda.
Doğan, Didem. “Yeni Kurulan Üniversitelerin Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri [Problems of Newly-Founded Universities and Solution Offers].” Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi 3, no. 2 (2013): 108-116.
Erdem, Ali Rıza. “Üniversite Anlayışındaki Değişim: Birinci Nesil Üniversiteden Dördüncü Nesil Üniversiteye [Change in Mental of University: From the First Generation University to the Fourth Generation].” TYB Akademi Dil Edebiyat ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 16, no. 16 (2016): 21-52.
Ergüder, Üstün, Mehmet Şahin, Tosun Terzioğlu, and Öktem Vardar. Neden Yeni Bir Yükseköğretim Vizyonu [Why A New Higher Education Vision]. İstanbul: İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi, 2009.
European Commission and OECD. “A Guiding Framework for Entrepreneurial Universities.” (2012). Accessed July 27, 2022. https://www.oecd.org/site/cfecpr/EC-OECD%20Entrepreneurial%20Universities%20Framework.pdf.
Fosu, Agyei. “Readiness of Universities for the 21st Century Digital Economies: A look at Selected Lecturers from Universities in Buffalo City Metropolitan in Eastern Cape Province South Africa.” International Journal of Community Development and Management Studies 3 (2019), 65-77.
Frondizi, Rocco, Chiara Fantauzzi, Nathalie Colasanti, and Gloria Fiorani. “The Evaluation of Universities’ Third Mission and Intellectual Capital: Theoretical Analysis and Application to Italy.” Sustainability 11, no. 12 (2019): 1-23.
Gibbons, James F. “The Role of Stanford University: A Dean’s Reflections.” In The Silicon Valley Edge: A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, edited by Chong-Moon Lee, William F. Miller, Marguerite Gong Hancock, and Henry S. Rowen, 200-217. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000. Quoted in Wolfe David A., “The Role of Universities in Regional Development and Cluster Formation.” In Creating Knowledge, Strengthening Nations: The Changing Role of Higher Education, edited by Glen A. Jones, Patricia McCarney, and Michael L. Skolnik, 167-194. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016.
Goddard, John. Higher Education and Regions: Globally Competitive, Locally Engaged. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2007.
Göransson, Bo, and Claes Brundenius, eds. Universities in Transition: The Changing Role and Challenges for Academic Institutions. New York: Springer, 2011.
Gray, Brendan J., Kim Shyan Fam, and Violeta A. Llanes. “Branding Universities in Asian Markets.” Journal of Product & Brand Management 12, no.2 (2003): 108-120.
Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin, and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 105-117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
Harvey, Lee. “Employability: Developing the Relationship Between Higher Education and Employment.” Opening presentation at the Fifth Quality in Higher Education 24-Hour Seminar, Warwick University, October 1999. Accessed August 12, 2021. http://qualityresearchinternational.com/esecttools/relatedpubs/Employability5thQHE.pdf.
Hazelkorn, Ellen, and Jeroen Huisman. “Higher Education in the 21st Century– Diversity of Missions.” Higher Education Policy 21, no. 2 (2008): 147-150.
Hénard, Fabrice, Leslie Diamond, and Deborah Roseveare. Approaches to Internationalisation and Their Implications for Strategic Management and Institutional Practice: A Guide for Higher Education Institutions (Paris: OECD, 2012). Accessed August 12, 2021. https://www.oecd.org/education/imhe/Approaches%20to%20internationalisation%20-%20final%20-%20web.pdf.
Hickey, Gary, and Cheryl Kipping. “A Multi-Stage Approach to the Coding of Data from Open-Ended Questions.” Nurse Researcher 4 (1996), 81-91.
Higher Education Information Management System. “2020-2021 Higher Education Statistics.” Accessed July 24, 2022. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/.
Jaspers, Karl. The Idea of the University. London: Peter Owen Ltd, 1965.
Karataş Acer, Ebru, and Nezahat Güçlü. “Türkiye’de Yükseköğretimin Genişlemesi: Gerekçeler ve Ortaya Çıkan Sorunlar [The expansion of higher education in Turkey: The rationales behind this expansion and its challenges].” Yükseköğretim Dergisi 7, no. 1 (2017): 28-38.
Kettunen, Juha. “Stakeholder Relationships in Higher Education.” Tertiary Education and Management 21, no. 1 (2015): 56-65.
King, Roger. “The Contemporary University.” In The University in the Global Age, edited by Roger King, 1-27. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2004.
Kyrö, Paula, and Johanna Mattila. “Towards Future University by Integrating Entrepreneurial and the 3rd Generation University Concept.” Paper presented at the 17th Nordic Conference on Small Business Research, Helsinki, Finland, May, 2012. Accessed July 27, 2022. http://pyk2.aalto.fi/ncsb2012/Kyro.pdf.
Lengyel, Imre. “Távolság versus közelség” dilemma az ipari-egyetemi kapcsolatokon alapuló tudásalapú helyi gazdaságfejlesztésben. In A gazdasági környezet és a vállalati stratégiák. A IX. Ipar- és vállalatgazdasági konferencia előadásai, Sgezed, 2008, 551-562. Quoted in Miklós Lukovics, and Bence Zuti, “Successful Universities Towards the Improvement of Regional Competitiveness: ‘Fourth Generation’ Universities.” Paper presented at the European Regional Science Association (ERSA) 53th Congress, Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy, Palermo, Italy, August 2013.
Lockwood, Robert C., and Jerry Hadd. “Building A Brand in Higher Education.” Gallup Management Journal 12 (2007): 1-6.
Lukovics, Miklós, and Bence Zuti. “Successful Universities Towards the Improvement of Regional Competitiveness: ‘Fourth Generation’ Universities.” Paper presented at the European Regional Science Association (ERSA) 53th Congress, Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy, Palermo, Italy, August 2013.
Mızıkacı, Fatma. Higher Education in Turkey. Bucharest: UNESCO/CEPES, 2006.
Morawska-Jancelewicz, Joanna. “The Role of Universities in Social Innovation Within Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Model: Practical Implications from Polish Experience.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00804-y.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Transition to Learning Economies and Societies. Paris: OECD, 1996.
Özoğlu, Murat, Bekir Gür, and Sedat Gümüş. “Rapid Expansion of Higher Education in Turkey: The Challenges of Recently Established Public Universities (2006– 2013).” Higher Education Policy 29, no.1 (2016): 21–39.
Požarnik, Barica Marentič. “Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Through Supporting Professional Development of Teaching Staff.” Napredak 150, no. 34 (2009): 341- 359.
Presidency of the Republic of Turkey Strategy and Budget Presidency. 11. Kalkınma Planı [The 11th Development Plan] (2019-2023). Ankara: Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı, 2019. Accessed July 27, 2022. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/On_Birinci_Kalkinma_Plani-2019-2023.pdf.
Rabbinge, Rudy, and Maja Slingerland. “Change in Knowledge Infrastructure: The Third Generation University.” In Transitions Towards Sustainable Agriculture and Food Chains in Peri-Urban Areas, edited by Krijin J. Poppe, Catherine Termeer, and Maja Slingerland, 51-61. Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2009.
Rinaldi, Chiara, Alessio Cavicchi, Francesca Spigarelli, Luigi Lacchè, and Arthur Rubens. “Universities and Smart Specialisation Strategy: From Third Mission to Sustainable Development Co-Creation.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 19, no. 1 (2018): 67-84.
Selvitopu, Abdullah, and Ayhan Aydın. “Türk Yükseköğretiminde Uluslararasılaşma Stratejileri: Süreç Yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Nitel Bir İnceleme [Internationalization Strategies in Turkish Higher Education: A Qualitative Inquiry in the Process Approach Context].” Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 33, no.4 (2018): 803-823.
Simmons, John. “Reconciling Effectiveness and Equity in Performance Management: A Stakeholder Synthesis Approach to Organizational Systems Design.” Systemic and Action Research 16, no. 5 (2003): 355–365.
Szwajkowski, Eugene. “Simplifying The Principles or Stakeholder Management: The Three Most Important Principles.” Business & Society 39, no. 4 (2000): 379–396.
Trippl, Michaela, Tanja Sinozic, and Helen Lawton Smith. “The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria.” European Planning Studies 23, no. 9 (2015): 1722-1740.
Vaessen, Peter, and Martin Van Der Velde. “University Knowledge Transfer Through Social and Professional Embeddedness: A Case Study.” In Economic Geography of Higher Education: Knowledge Infrastructure and Learning Regions, edited by Roel Rutten, Frans Boekema, and Elsa Kuijpers, 87-109. London: Routledge, 2003.
Valitov, Shamil M. “University Brand as a Modern Way of Winning Competitive Advantage.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 152 (2014): 295-299.
Wach, Elise, and Richard Ward. “Learning About Qualitative Document Analysis.” Institute of Development Studies, Practice Paper in Brief 13, (2013): 1-9.
Wissema, Johan G. Towards the Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
1. Authorship:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
3. Users:
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
.jpg)
1.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
