Medical Educators’ conceptions about Generic Competences in Argentina: Contributions for consensus building
Abstract
Healthcare professionals’ education is evolving to meet people’s needs towards a more comprehensive, collaborative and interdisciplinary training. In medical education in Argentina, in the context of international discussions around competence-based education (CBE), competence frameworks are being developed for undergraduate and postgraduate education, constituting agreed criteria that lead to the design of training programs and work as key tools to ensure educational quality. The Tuning Project and other international frameworks account for this process towards a common definition of standards beyond geographic and disciplinary boundaries. Generic competences (GCs) have acquired increased relevance in CBE discussions, whereas in medical education they involve key skills for patient safety – yet clarity in their implementation still has to be accomplished. In competence-based medical education (CBME), some changes are being hindered by the absence of a common language as well as diverging ideologies and theories. The purpose of this work was to explore conceptions and the terms used when referring to GCs by people in charge of educational planning and design of Human Resources (HR) training policies in Argentina. A qualitative informants from different levels and fields in medical education. Interviews were conducted by one interviewer and analysed by two independent researchers. Results showed that medical educational planners have different conceptions regarding GCs and fail to share a common language to enunciate them. They acknowledge their relevance for patient safety and agree with the notion that, at this time of educational transformation, it would be useful to enunciate them separately from specific competences, although they realise that this involves potential risks in curricular design. From all terms used in this regard, “generic competence” was identified as a contradiction in itself. Consensus on denomination, meaning and visibility in curricula is mandatory.
Received: 26 April 2018
Accepted: 18 May 2018
Published online: 31 May 2018
Downloads
References
Altermatt, Christel H., ed. Educación Superior en América Latina: reflexiones y perspectivas en Medicina. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto, 2013.
_____ . “El proyecto Tuning latinoamericano: la experiencia del área de Medicina.” Rev Hosp Clin Univ Chile 25 (2013): 19-31.
Alves de Lima, Alberto E. and Juan P. Costabel. “Marcos de Referencia para la evaluación del desempeño profesional en el ámbito de trabajo.” Rev Fed Arg Cardiol 44, no. 2 (2015): 118-123.
Arce, Hugo E. “Organización y financiamiento del sistema de salud en la Argentina.” Medicina 72, no. 5 (2012): 414-418. http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/medba/v72n5/v72n5a11.pdf.
Association of American Medical Colleges. “Physicians for the Twenty-First Century. The GPEP Report: Report of the Panel on the General Professional Education of the Physician and College Preparation for Medicine.” J Med Educ. 59, no. 11 (1984): 1-208.
Atkins, Jo. “Tribalism, Loss and Grief: Issues for Multiprofessional Education.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 12, no. 3 (1998): 303-307. doi: 10.3109/13561829809014121.
Barrera Morales, Marcos F. Modelos epistémicos en Educación y en Investigación. Caracas: Sypal, 2007.
Beneitone, Pablo, César Esquetini, Julia González, Maida Marty Maletá, Gabriela Siufi, and Robert Wagennar, eds. Reflections on and Outlook for Higher Education in Latin America. Final Report Tuning Latin American Project 2004- 2007. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto, 2007.
Beneitone, Pablo and Edurne Bartolomé. “Global generic competences with local ownership: a comparative study from the perspective of graduates in four world regions.” Tuning Journal For Higher Education 1, no. 2 (2014): 303-34. doi:10.18543/tjhe-1(2)-2014pp303-334.
Bleakley, Alan, John Bligh, and Julie Browne. Medical Education for the Future. Identity, Power and Location. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9692-0.
Brailovsky, Carlos A. “Educación médica, evaluación de las competencias.” In Aportes para un cambio curricular en Argentina 2001, edited by PAHO/WHO, 103-20. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Medicina, 2001.
Brailovsky Carlos A. and Ángel M. Centeno. “Algunas Tendencias Actuales en Educación Médica.” REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria 10 (2012): 23- 33. doi: 10.4995/redu.2012.6091.
Carraccio, Carol, Robert Englander, Joseph Gilhooly, Richard Mink, Dena Hofkosh, Michael A. Barone and Eric S. Holmboe. “Building a Framework of Entrustable Professional Activities, Supported by Competencies and Milestones, to Bridge the Educational Continuum.” Acad Med. 92, no. 3 (March 2017): 324-330. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001141.
Cinque, Maria. “‘Lost in translation’. Soft skills development in European countries.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 3, no. 2 (2016): 389-427. doi: 10.18543/ tjhe-3(2)-2016pp389-427.
Davini, Cristina and María Isabel Duré, coords. Guía para la elaboración de. Documentos Marco de Referencia. Buenos Aires: Mimeo, 2013.
Duré, María Isabel and María del Carmen Cadile, comps. La gestión de recursos humanos en salud – Una estrategia de consensos 2008-2015. Argentina: Ministerio de Salud de la Nación Argentina, 2015.
Englander, Robert, Jason R. Frank, Carol Carraccio, Jonathan Sherbino, Shelley Ross, Linda Snell, and on behalf of the ICBME Collaborators. “Toward a shared language for competency-based medical education.” Medical Teacher 39, no. 6 (2017): 582-587. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315066.
Fernandez, Nicolas, Valerie Dory, Louis-Georges, Ste-Marie Monique, Chaput Bernard, and Charlin Andree Boucher. “Varying conceptions of competence: an analysis of how health sciences educators define competence.” Medical Education 46 (2012): 357-365. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04183.x.
Festinger, Leon. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Standford, California: Stanford University Press, 1957.
Foucault, Michel. “La prosa del mundo.” In Las palabras y las cosas. Una Arqueología de las ciencias humanas, 26-52. París: Éditions Gallimard, 1966.
Frenk, Julio, Lincoln Chen, Zulfi qar A. Bhutta, Jordan Cohen, Nigel Crisp, Timothy Evans, Harvey Fineberg, et al. “Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.” The Lancet 376, no. 9756 (2010): 1923-1958. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
Gimeno Sacristán, José. “Diez tesis sobre la aparente utilidad de las competencias en educación.” In Educar por competencias, ¿qué hay de nuevo?, compiled by José Gimeno Sacristán, 15-58. Madrid: Morata, 2008.
Hodges, Brian D. and Lorelei Lingard L. The Question of Competence: Reconsidering Medical Education in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Cornell University Press, 2012.
Holmboe, Eric S., Jonathan Sherbino, Robert Englander, Linda Snell, Jason R. Frank, and on half of the ICBME Collaborators. “A call to action: The controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education.” Medical Teacher 39, no. 6 (2017): 574-581. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315067.
Huddle, Thomas S. and Gustavo R. Heudebert. “Viewpoint: Taking Apart the Art: The Risk of Anatomizing Clinical Competence.” Acad Med 82 (2007): 536-541.
Irby, David M., Molly Cooke, and Bridget C. O’Brien. “Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010.” Acad Med. 85, no. 2 (February 2010): 220-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c88449.
Jacobs, Johanna, Arno Muijtjens, Scheltus Van Luijk, Cees Van Der Vleuten, Gerda Croiset, and Fedde Scheele. “Impact of institute and person variables on teachers’ conceptions of learning and teaching.” Medical Teacher 37, no. 8 (2015): 1-9. doi 10.3109/0142159X.2014.970985.
Lattuca Lisa R. and Joan S. Stark. Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. United States: Jossey-Bass Inc., 2009.
Lazarus, Nabahodoi. “Developing Generic Competences in Life Sciences: the untold story of the Makerere University College of Health Sciences in Uganda.” Tuning Journal For Higher Education 4, no. 2 (2017): 389-406. doi: 10.18543/tjhe-4(2)-2017pp389-406.
Lee, Nadine van der, Joanne P. I. Fokkema, and Fedde Scheele. “Generic competencies in postgraduate medical training: their importance illustrated by a doctor’s narrative on competency-based practice.” Zdrav Var 51 (2012): 280-284. doi: 10.2478/v10152-012-0031-y.
Lingard, Lorelei. “What we see and don’t see when we look at ‘competence’: notes on a god term.” Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 14, no. 5 (November 2009): 625-8. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9206-y.
Loon, Karsten A. van et al. “The role of Generic Competences in the entrustment of professional activities: A nationwide competency-based curriculum assessed.” J Grad. Med. Educ. 8, no. 4 (October 2016): 546-552. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00321.1.
Ministerio de Salud de la Nación. Resolution 1342/2007 – Residencias del equipo de salud/Sistema nacional de acreditación de residencias. Official Gazette 26-oct- 2007 no. 31268.
_____. Guía para la elaboración de Marcos de Referencia. Argentina: Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, 2013.
Mulder, Martin. “Conceptions of Professional Competence.” In International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning, edited by Stephen Billett, Christian Harteis, and Hans Gruber, 107-137. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.
Nousiainen, Markku T., Kelly J. Caverzagie, Peter C. Ferguson, Jason R. Frank, and on half of the ICBME Collaborators. “Implementing competency-based medical education. What changes in curricular structure and processes are needed?” Med Teach. 39, no. 6 (June 2017): 568-573. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315077.
Palés-Argullós, Jordi and Maria Nolla-Domenjó. “Generic competencies, an unresolved issue in faculties of medicine.” FEM 19, no. 5 (2016): 227-228.
Pan American Health Organization. Health Agenda for the Americas 2008-2017. Washington, D.C.: PAHO, 2007.
_____. Formación en Medicina orientada hacia la atención primaria de la salud – Serie la Renovación de la Atención Primaria de Salud en las Américas. No. 2. Washington D.C.: PAHO, 2008.
Pangaro, Louis and Olle Ten Cate. “Frameworks for learner assessment in medicine: AMEE Guide Nº78.” Med Teach 35, no. 6 (June 2013): 1197-210. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.788789.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. “Better standards, better physicians, better care.” Accessed April 2018. http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/canmeds/canmeds-framework-e.
Sanne Peters, Geraldine Clarebout, Marc van Nuland, Bert Aertgeerts, and Ann Roex. “A Qualitative Exploration of Multiple Perspectives on Transfer of Learning Between Classroom and Clinical Workplace.” Teach Learn Med. 30, no. 1 (July 2017): 22-32. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1339605.42.
Talbot, Martin. “Monkey see, monkey do: a critique of the competency model in graduate medical education.” Med Educ. 38, no. 6 (June 2004): 587-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01794.x.
Ten Cate, Olle. “Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training.” Med Educ. 39, no. 12 (2005): 1176-1177. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x.
_____. “Competency-Based Education, Entrustable Professional Activities, and the Power of Language.” J Grad Med Educ. 5, no. 1 (March 2013): 6-7.
_____. “What is a 21st century doctor? Rethinking the significance of medical degree.” Acad Med. 89, no. 7 (2014): 966-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000280.
Torres Santomé, Jurjo. Globalización e interdisciplinariedad: el curriculum integrado. España: Ediciones Morata, 1994.
Wagenaar, Robert. “Competences and learning outcomes: a panacea for understanding the (new) role of Higher Education?” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1, no. 2 (2014): 273-302. doi: 10.18543/tjhe-1(2)-2014pp279-302.
Whitehead, Cynthia R. “Getting off the carousel: De-centring the curriculum in medical education.” Perspect Med Educ. 6, no. 5 (October 2017): 283-285. doi: 10.1007/s40037-017-0373-x.
Whitehead, Cynthia R., Brian D. Hodges, and Zubin Austin. “Captive on a carousel: discourses of ‘new’ in medical education.” Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 18, no. 4 (October 2013):755-68. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9414-8.
Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:
1. Authorship:
The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.
2. Copyright and Code of conduct:
a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).
c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.
e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
3. Users:
Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.