Predictive role of psychological capital and perceived organizational support on innovative work behavior among higher education teachers of Pakistan

  • Maria Wahid Institute of Business Management (IoBM), Pakistan
  • Nadia Ayub Institute of Business Management (IoBM), Pakistan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2715
Keywords: psychological capital, perceived organizational support, innovative work behavior, higher education teachers

Abstract

The current study aimed to determine the predictive role of Psychological Capital (PsyCap) and Perceived Organizational Support (POS) on Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) among higher education teachers of Pakistan. A sample of 200 higher education teachers was recruited from various private and public sector institutes across Pakistan. The analysis revealed significant relationship between psychological capital and innovative work behavior (r= .700); and; perceived organizational support and innovative work behavior (r= .305). Also, psychological capital and perceived organizational support were found to be strong predictors of innovative work behavior (R= .700). In conclusion, when teachers possess psychological capital as their personal resource and perceived organizational support as social resource at workplace; they are more likely to demonstrate innovation into their work behavior.

Received: 10 March 2023
Accepted: 28 November 2023

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maria Wahid, Institute of Business Management (IoBM), Pakistan

Lecturer in the Department of Business Psychology, Institute of Business Management (IoBM), Karachi, Pakistan. Maria completed MPhil in Organizational Psychology from IoBM and BS in Professional Psychology from Institute of Professional Psychology, Bahria University, Karachi. She also has relevant experience as a Research Associate for two years at IoBM and became truly devoted to pursuing a career in research and teaching. Her interest lies in writing academic research in the areas of organizational psychology, social issues, positive psychology, learning, and development.

Nadia Ayub, Institute of Business Management (IoBM), Pakistan

Professor and Dean of College of Economics and Social Development, IoBM. Dr. Ayub completed a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia, and earned a Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology from the University of Karachi, Pakistan. She is HEC approved Ph.D. Supervisor and supervised a number of MPhil & Ph.D. theses at IoBM. Her research focuses on social problems, adolescents, organizational issues, personality, family and marriages, and Psychometrics. She has published more than forty journal articles, presented research papers at Harvard University, the USA in 2012 & 2013 and around the world, and served as a reviewer of Impact factor journals including the Australian Journal of Psychology and PsyCH Journal.

References

Abukhait, Rawan, Shaker Bani-Melhem, and Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin. 2020. “Do employee resilience, focus on opportunity, and work-related curiosity predict innovative work behaviour? The mediating role of career adaptability.” International Journal of Innovation Management 24, no. 07: 2050070. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781800610316_0002.

Adil, Adnan, and Anila Kamal. 2019. “Authentic leadership and psychological capital in job demands-resources model among Pakistani university teachers.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 23, no. 06: 734-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1580772.

Afsar, Bilal, and Yuosre Badir. 2017. “Workplace spirituality, perceived organizational support and innovative work behavior: The mediating effects of person-organization fit.” Journal of workplace Learning 29, no. 2: 95-109.

Ahmad, Ashfaq, Hazrat Bilal, and Palwasha Bibi. 2020. “Determinants of organizational commitment among academics of HEIs: The buffering role of coworker support.” Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences 3, no. 2: 221-233. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v3i2.56.

Ahmad, Ifzal, Mueen Aizaz Zafar, and Khurram Shahzad. 2015. “Authentic leadership style and academia’s creativity in higher education institutions: intrinsic motivation and mood as mediators.” Transylvanian review of administrative sciences 11, no. 46: 5-19.

Anomneze, Edith A., Dorothy I. Ugwu, Ibeawuchi K. Enwereuzor, and Leonard I. Ugwu. 2016. “Teachers’ emotional labour and burnout: Does perceived organizational support matter.” Asian Social Science 12, no. 2: 9-22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n2p9.

Arnold, Kara A., and Kathryne E. Dupré. 2012. “Perceived organizational support, employee health and emotions.” International Journal of Workplace Health Management 5, no. 2: 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538351211239171.

Arshadi, Nasrin. 2011. “The relationships of perceived organizational support (POS) with organizational commitment, in-role performance, and turnover intention: Mediating role of felt obligation.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 30: 1103-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.215.

Aspinwall, Lisa G. 1998. “Rethinking the role of positive affect in self-regulation.” Motivation and emotion 22: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023080224401.

Bernarto, Innocentius, Diana Bachtiar, Niko Sudibjo, Ian Nurpatria Suryawan, Agus Purwanto, and Masduki Asbari. 2020. “Effect of transformational leadership, perceived organizational support, job satisfaction toward life satisfaction: Evidences from indonesian teachers.” International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29 no. 3: 5495 – 5503.

Bharadwaj, Sundar, and Anil Menon. 2000. “Making innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both?.” Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association 17, no. 6 (2000): 424-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1760424.

Cropanzano, Russell, Erica L. Anthony, Shanna R. Daniels, and Alison V. Hall. 2017. “Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies.” Academy of management annals 11, no. 1: 479-516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099.

Dall’Alba, Gloria. 1994 “The role of teaching in higher education: Enabling students to enter a field of study and practice.” Learning and Instruction 3, no. 4: 299- 313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(93)90021-Q.

De Jong, J. P., and Deanne N. Den Hartog. 2008. “Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation.” EIM Business and Policy Research 8, no. 1: 1-27.

Demir, Selcuk. 2018. “The relationship between psychological capital and stress, anxiety, burnout, job satisfaction, and job involvement.” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 18, no. 75: 137-153. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.75.8.

Durrheim, Kevin. 2006. “Research design.” Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences 2, no. 1: 33-59.

Eisenberger, Robert, Glenn P. Malone, and William D. Presson. 2016. “Optimizing perceived organizational support to enhance employee engagement.” Society for Human Resource Management and Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2, no. 2016: 3-22.

Eisenberger, Robert, Robin Huntington, Steven Hutchison, and Debora Sowa. 1986. “Perceived organizational support.” Journal of Applied psychology 71, no. 3: 500. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500.

Eisenberger, Robert, Stephen Armeli, Barbara Rexwinkel, Patrick D. Lynch, and Linda Rhoades. 2001. “Reciprocation of perceived organizational support.” Journal of applied psychology 86, no. 1: 42.

Fakhrorazi, A., H. Hartini, and Rabiul Islam. 2019 “The outcomes of individual absorptive capacity among academicians in Malaysian public universities.” Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 7, no. 1: 228-238. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7127.

Fatima, Afsheen, and Muhammad Asif Khan. 2017. “Do hope foster innovative work behavior through employee engagement and knowledge sharing behavior? A conservation of resources approach using MPLUS tool.” Business & Economic Review 9, no. 4: 181-212.

Fredrickson, Barbara L. 2001. “The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.” American psychologist 56, no. 3: 218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218.

Fredrickson, Barbara L. 2004. “The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions.” Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 359, no. 1449: 1367-1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512.

Gouldner, Alvin W. 1960. “The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement.” American sociological review: 161-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623.

Higer Education Commission Pakistan. 2017. “R & D Programs and Support Initiatives Policy Handbook.” Research & Development Division-Higher Education Commission Pakistan. December 2017.

Higgins, E. Tory. 1998. “Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle.” In Advances in experimental social psychology 30: 1-46. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0.

Hobfoll, Stevan E. 2002. “Social and psychological resources and adaptation.” Review of general psychology 6, no. 4: 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307.

Hobfoll, Stevan E. 2011. “Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings.” Journal of occupational and organizational psychology 84, no. 1: 116- 122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02016.x.

Hosseini, Soheila, and Zahra Rastegar Haghighi Shirazi. 2021. “Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model.” Cogent Education 8, no. 1: 1869364. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1869364.

Hsiao, Hsi-Chi, Jen-Chia Chang, Ya-Ling Tu, and Su-Chang Chen. 2011. “The impact of self-efficacy on innovative work behavior for teachers.” International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 1, no. 1: 31. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2011.V1.6.

Huhtala, Hannele, and Marjo-Riitta Parzefall. 2007. “A review of employee well-being and innovativeness: An opportunity for a mutual benefit.” Creativity and innovation management 16, no. 3: 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00442.x.

Janssen, Onne. 2000. “Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour.” Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology 73, no. 3: 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038.

Kalyar, Masood Nawaz, Munazza Saeed, Aydin Usta, and Imran Shafique. 2021. “Workplace cyberbullying and creativity: examining the roles of psychological distress and psychological capital.” Management Research Review 44, no. 4: 607-624. . https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2020-0130.

Kim, Min-Sun. 2016. “Social exchange theory.” The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy: 1-9.

Le, Phong Ba, and Hui Lei. 2019. “Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support.” Journal of knowledge management 23, no. 3: 527-547. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2018-0568.

Levene, Ronald A. 2015. “Positive psychology at work: Psychological capital and thriving as pathways to employee engagement.” Master of Applied Positive Psychology (MAPP) Capstone Projects 88. http://repository.upenn.edu/mapp_capstone/88.

Lew, Tek. 2009. “The relationships between perceived organizational support, felt obligation, affective organizational commitment and turnover intention of academics working with private higher educational institutions in Malaysia.” European Journal of Social Sciences 9, no. 1: 72-87.

Luthans, Fred, and Carolyn M. Youssef. 2004. “Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage.” Organizational Dynamics 33, no. 2: 143–160.

Luthans, Fred, and Carolyn M. Youssef-Morgan. 2017. “Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach.” Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior 4: 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324.

Luthans, Fred, Carolyn M. Youssef, David S. Sweetman, and Peter D. Harms. 2013. “Meeting the leadership challenge of employee well-being through relationship PsyCap and health PsyCap.” Journal of leadership & organizational studies 20, no. 1: 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812465893.

Luthans, Fred. 2002. “The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior.” Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior 23, no. 6: 695-706.

Malik, Sadia, and Saima Noreen. 2015. “Perceived organizational support as a moderator of affective well-being and occupational stress.” Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS) 9, no. 3: 865-874. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/188227.

Martins, Ellen-Caroline, and Fransie Terblanche. 2003. “Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation.” European journal of innovation management 6, no. 1: 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456337.

Mudrak, Jiri, Katerina Zabrodska, Petr Kveton, Martin Jelinek, Marek Blatny, Iva Solcova, and Katerina Machovcova. 2018. “Occupational well-being among university faculty: A job demands-resources model.” Research in Higher Education 59: 325-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9467-x.

Musenze, Ibrahim Abaasi, Thomas Sifuna Mayende, Ahmed Jowalie Wampande, Joseph Kasango, and Ongario Ronald Emojong. 2021. “Mechanism between perceived organizational support and work engagement: explanatory role of self-efficacy.” Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences 37, no. 4: 471-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-02-2020-0016.

Mustika, Silvia Indra, Kusdi Rahardjo, and Arik Prasetya. 2020.”The effect of perceived organizational support on knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior.” In 2nd Annual International Conference on Business and Public Administration (AICoBPA 2019), pp. 61-64. Atlantis Press.

Mutonyi, Barbara Rebecca. 2021. “Employees’ psychological capital and innovative behavior in higher education.” International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 13, no. 2: 198-215. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2020-0024.

Naz, Farah, and Hasan Sohaib Murad. 2017. “Innovative teaching has a positive impact on the performance of diverse students.” Sage Open 7, no. 4: 2158244017734022. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017734022.

Nazir, Sajjad, Wang Qun, Li Hui, and Amina Shafi. 2018. “Influence of social exchange relationships on affective commitment and innovative behavior: Role of perceived organizational support.” Sustainability 10, no. 12: 4418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124418.

Okeke, A., C. N. Eze, T. M. Oguegbe, and C. E. Ogbonnaya. 2019. “Psychological availability, psychological safety and optimism as predictors of innovative behavior among workers.” International Journal of Psychological Research and Reviews 2, no. 16: 1-7.

Purc, Ewelina, and Mariola Laguna. 2019. “Personal values and innovative behavior of employees.” Frontiers in psychology 10: 439048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00865.

Qaiser Danish, Rizwan, Ali Asghar, Muhammad Jam e Kausar, Tayyaba Mehmood, Qazi Muhammad Ali, Shumaila Qaseem, and Hafiz Fawad Ali. 2019. “Impact of personality characteristics on innovative work behavior through emotional labor in Education Sector of Pakistan.” European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings 8, no. 2: 70-85.

Ramamoorthy, Nagarajan, Patrick C. Flood, Tracy Slattery, and Ron Sardessai. 2005. “Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model.” Creativity and innovation management 14, no. 2: 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x.

Ratnaningsih, Ika Zenita, Unika Prihatsanti, and Anggun Resdasari Prasetyo. 2016. “Predicting Innovative Behavior Among Employess in a Manufacturing Company: The Role of Psychological Capital.” Anima Indonesian Psychogical Capital 31, no. 2: 84-90.

Rehman, Saif ur, Cao Qingren, Yasir Latif, and Pervaiz Iqbal. 2017. “Impact of psychological capital on occupational burnout and performance of faculty members.” International Journal of Educational Management 31, no. 4: 455- 469. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2016-0011.

Rineer, Jennifer R., Donald M. Truxillo, Todd E. Bodner, Leslie B. Hammer, and Mariah A. Kraner. 2017. “The moderating effect of perceived organizational support on the relationships between organizational justice and objective measures of cardiovascular health.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 26, no. 3: 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1277207.

Scott, Susanne G., and Reginald A. Bruce. 1994. “Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace.” Academy of management journal 37, no. 3: 580-607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701.

Seligman, Martin EP, and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2000. Positive psychology: An introduction. Vol. 55, no. 1. American Psychological Association.

Siregar, Zulkifli Musannip Efendi, Eeng Ahman Suryana, and Syamsul Hadi Senen. 2019. “Factors influencing innovative work behavior: an individual factors perspective.” International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 8, no. 9: 324-327.

Siu, Oi Ling, Francis Cheung, and Steve Lui. 2015. “Linking positive emotions to work well-being and turnover intention among Hong Kong police officers: The role of psychological capital.” Journal of happiness studies 16, no. 2: 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9513-8.

Slåtten, Terje, Barbara Rebecca Mutonyi, and Gudbrand Lien. 2020. “The impact of individual creativity, psychological capital, and leadership autonomy support on hospital employees’ innovative behaviour.” BMC Health Services Research 20: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05954-4.

Soykan, Andrea, Dianne Gardner, and Terence Edwards. 2019. “Subjective wellbeing in New Zealand teachers: An examination of the role of psychological capital.” Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools 29, no. 2: 130- 138. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2019.14.

Supriyadi, Dikdik, Lely Nur Hidayah Syafitri, Syukri Fathudin Achmad Widodo, Ridhoul Wahidi, Yusvita Nena Arinta, Faqih Nabhan, Abdul Mufid et al. 2020. “Innovation and authentic leadership of islamic university lectures in faculty pharmacy faculty: What is the role of psychological capital.” Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 11, no. 8: 383-393.

Susilo, Heru. 2019. “Improving innovative work behavior and organizational performance through workplace spirituality and perceived organizational support.” In Annual International Conference of Business and Public Administration (AICoBPA 2018), pp. 101-105. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aicobpa-18.2019.24.

Thevanes, N., and Y. Saranraj. 2018. “The impact of perceived organizational support on job satisfaction of academic staff.” Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting 6, no. 2: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEBA/2018/39809.

Ul-Haq, Muhammad Anwar, Yan Jingdong, Nazar Hussain Phulpoto, and Muhammad Usman. 2014. “Analysing National Innovation System of Pakistan.” Developing Country Studies 4, no. 4: 133-139.

Wojtczuk-Turek, Agnieszka. 2012. “Innovative work behavior and psychological capital–analysis of relationships.” Organizacja i Zarządzanie: kwartalnik naukowy 3, no. 19: 71-88.

Yalcin, Sinan. 2016. “Analyzing the Relationship between Positive Psychological Capital and Organizational Commitment of the Teachers.” International Education Studies 9, no. 8: 75-83. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n8p75.

Yıldız, Bora, Serhat Erat, Lütfihak Alpkan, Harun Yıldız, and Bülent Sezen. 2015. “Drivers of innovative constructive deviance: A moderated mediation analysis.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 195: 1407-1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.436.

Yildiz, Bora, Sümeyra Uzun, and Serdar Semih Coşkun. 2017. “Drivers of innovative behaviors: The moderator roles of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment.” International Journal of Organizational Leadership 6: 341-360. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335714.

Zaman, Muhammad Hamid. 2012. “Innovations in higher education teaching.” The Express Tribune, June 3, 2012. https://tribune.com.pk/story/388212/innovations-in-higher-education-teaching.

Published
2024-05-31
How to Cite
Wahid, Maria, and Nadia Ayub. 2024. “Predictive Role of Psychological Capital and Perceived Organizational Support on Innovative Work Behavior Among Higher Education Teachers of Pakistan”. Tuning Journal for Higher Education 11 (2), 191-219. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2715.
Issue
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): Preparedness for higher education: What does it mean for today and tomorrow?
Section
Articles

Authors are required to sign and submit a copyright transfer agreement after acceptance but before publication of their manuscript. To that effect, they receive, from the Managing Editor of Tuning Journal for Higher Education, a standard copyright assignment form designed along the following lines:

1. Authorship:

The author who signs the copyright transfer agreement must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the contributing authors.

2. Copyright and Code of conduct:

a) Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate TJHE Ethical Guidelines for Publication and any codes (of conduct), privacy and confidentiality agreements, laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.

b) Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Tuning Journal for Higher Education (TJHE).

c) Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the work in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.

d) Authors retain the right to archive, present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work (publisher's version) to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Tuning Journal) is acknowledged properly and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the wortk.

e) Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.

3. Users:

Tuning Journal for Higher Education is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.